Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

rubbersole

(10,574 posts)

13. The SC might use this case to try to regain some street cred.

Reply to lostincalifornia (Original post)

Tue Sep 2, 2025, 09:07 AM

Sep 2

The language in the Constitution couldn't be more clear. tsf is circling the drain and barking at clouds. Tariffs are economically stupid and counterproductive. But, but the Federalist Society might have other motives...and logic no longer pertains.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The speculation from many so-called legal analysts is that the Supreme Court will back the lower court rulings [View all] lostincalifornia Sep 2 OP

I'd like to see a variety of Amicus briefs submitted by no_hypocrisy Sep 2 #1

That would be interesting, however, when I saw the thugs on the SC twisting themselves into pretzels trying lostincalifornia Sep 2 #4

Points taken. However, I would like to have the premiere legal minds put on record no_hypocrisy Sep 2 #5

Shopping for the next tariff loophole won't be a good look legally or publicly bucolic_frolic Sep 2 #2

You don't think he will do it? That is, they would look and employ a "tariff loophole"? lostincalifornia Sep 2 #3

I'm not convince that the Supreme Court will completely shut him down, but I agree about other avenues. unblock Sep 2 #6

Sadly, I'm in agreement with you. Gimpyknee Sep 2 #7

There has to be some sort of way to get the Deplorable base to NoMoreRepugs Sep 2 #8

My hope is that these analysts know something we do not about the personal intentions of people on the court SSJVegeta Sep 2 #9

Krugman today said Old Crank Sep 2 #10

This SCOTUS has put itself in the business MLWR Sep 2 #11

Yeah, but these are the same "experts" who said SCOTUS would never grant a President immunity for crimes Jersey Devil Sep 2 #12

The SC might use this case to try to regain some street cred. rubbersole Sep 2 #13

SCOTUS will support TSF using the legal principle... Girard442 Sep 2 #14

It will be interesting to see them claim that bananas and coffee are a threat to national security. nt Xipe Totec Sep 2 #15

Yesterday I read that T💩p's tariffs cost the US citizens $150B. OMGWTF Sep 2 #16

I'm very cynical about any case SCOTUS takes up ... aggiesal Sep 2 #17