Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

haele

(14,607 posts)
16. Billions. Seriously.
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 12:08 PM
Sep 2

As someone before pointed out, all current references to the Department of Defense on contracts, official documents like directives, instructions, MOAs, MOUs, and Regulations must be "changed" and re-signed.
Legal Personnel records and orders - like hiring documents, training records, Veterans Affairs, retirement and and other official action documents need to be updated, or otherwise identified as still applicable despite the change of the department that issued the document or directive/order.
Also, changing the Department can open up all sorts of chances for messing around with internal regulations that define limits to uses of force or lethality.. a modern Department of War can be defined to have other strategic goals than a Department of Defense might have - including loosening the criteria for "First Strike".
The reason the Department of Defense was created was to consolidate the various War Departments for the Navy and the Army (and Air Force) under a single funding, supply, and strategic umbrella that Congress could manage at all times, both in peace and war, after the interdepartmental bickering and political issues that caused all sorts of waste and fatal miscalculations encountered during WWII (like - why were there no heavy cruisers at D-Day?)

It's not just changing the letterhead that's going to cost us with this change.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Per Fox - the 2:00 announ...»Reply #16