Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: There is NO such thing as "CHILD PROSTITUTES". That term implies [View all]yardwork
(67,898 posts)52. To me the term does imply agency.
It's true that many sex workers are coerced or abused. However, some prostitutes consider themselves to be professional sex workers with their own agency.
I think all the OP is saying is that it's not appropriate to use a term implying agency for children who are victims.
I suspect we aren't really disagreeing here.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Yep. Palm Beach County state Prosecutor Barry Krischer was apparently just an awful person
Wiz Imp
Sep 4
#86
Trump has called the Epstein debacle a hoax. Others call the survivors child prostitutes. Where is the
OLDMDDEM
Sep 4
#3
"Underage women" is only ever used to mean, "that girl child that was raped." For boys, they say, "young man"
Scrivener7
Sep 4
#53
Right. Humans under 17 have no legal standing as "adult," nevermind "prostitute," which is inherently adult.
ancianita
Sep 4
#31
There are no "alternative" facts (child prostitutes") in this case Republicans
Stargazer99
Sep 4
#39
I wrote a poem about this subject -- for a friend who experienced it (trigger warning)
malthaussen
Sep 4
#72