Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Intractable

(1,278 posts)

6. They want to privatize it so weather info can be bought and sold, and/or censored if necessary.

Reply to ananda (Original post)

Fri Sep 5, 2025, 06:47 PM

Friday

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

rampartd ananda chowder66

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

OK, riddle me this... re weather forecasts. [View all] ananda Friday OP

"We are delighted to inform you that Climate Change no longer exists." - G.O.P., inc. BoRaGard Friday #1

Based on past events, my guess is Death. Death and Destruction. Hekate Friday #2

They want as few people as possible to make it to Medicare applegrove Friday #3

It sure does look that way, doesn't it? ananda Friday #10

He had the owner of the weather channel in his first administration IbogaProject Friday #4

Privatizing does seem to be the name of the game. ananda Friday #8

The timelyness of the Temp readings is already lagging IbogaProject Saturday #13

And the poor will not be able to afford weather predictions applegrove Friday #12

As in everything, they want to privatize it... Wounded Bear Friday #5

They want to privatize it so weather info can be bought and sold, and/or censored if necessary. Intractable Friday #6

A certain former senator was spreading serious Santorum in trying to get NWS assets sold to private interests. hatrack Friday #11

Probably Timewas Friday #7

LOL, I forgot about that one. ananda Friday #9

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»OK, riddle me this... re ...»Reply #6