General Discussion

* High-handed, patronizing condescension;
* seizing on a sliver and never letting go;
* ignoring reasonable responses;
* doing the Lucy football thing;
* keeping on and keeping on for the "winning" last word;
* repeating endlessly.

*** What you will always ignore here:
1- The video was new, current by airing the date posted.
2- The participants are credible and solid.
3- The words "executive order" came from them. (Looks like you didn't look at the video.)
4- The subject of the interview covered the participant's history under KRASNOV and his current status fighting.
5- The "old news" bit is a gratuitous, snobby slam.
6- Your making this out to be sensationalist exaggeration negates the participant's undergoing extreme personal and familial damage and sacrifice by KRASNOV's retribution and retaliation, and it's a quote from him that he was told that naming an individual in a, yes, executive order was never done before.
7- Whether KRASNOV did one thing five months ago doesn't not make it "a particularly horrendous thing" since he does these every day. It's one more abuse of power among the many, continuing ones.

*** None of this will faze you. Goodbye.