Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sop

(15,921 posts)
9. That's the correct and appropriate response.
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 05:15 PM
Wednesday

In contrast, Republicans will be calling for vengeance.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Should we be calling this "political violence" when we don't know spooky3 Wednesday #1
No kidding leftstreet Wednesday #2
How is speaking out against violence "trying to get PR"? You want "thoughts and prayers"? live love laugh Wednesday #14
Kirk was shot while he was giving a political speech. yardwork Wednesday #4
Yes, but it could have been someone in his personal life that spooky3 Wednesday #5
I understand that but this isn't the time to second guess messages calling for non-violence. yardwork Wednesday #12
Violence is bad, period; that is what should be said. Nt spooky3 Wednesday #17
So do I and just psted as such. nt Cha Wednesday #11
A political figure was shot is that not the definition of political violence? live love laugh Wednesday #7
No, that implies that someone on the left shot him, and you spooky3 Wednesday #10
No implication whatsoever that somebody on the left shot him. yardwork Wednesday #16
Sorry, I don't agree. Bloomberg News was quite clear in spooky3 Wednesday #21
I do not interpret the phrase like you. It doesn't matter who live love laugh Wednesday #19
Ok , this will be my last comment. When Rand Paul's neighbor beat him up, spooky3 Wednesday #22
Objectively, a well known fascist was shot and killed but we don't know why he was shot yet. GoodRaisin Wednesday #31
Not a good time for the FBI to be in disarray. Sneederbunk Wednesday #3
Excellent statements.. Rjecting "Political Violence" Cha Wednesday #6
They blamed it on the Democrats...of course they did. sheshe2 Wednesday #15
Yeah, like I read the Traitors to the USA are Cha Wednesday #25
I 100% agree with you, Cha. sheshe2 Wednesday #28
Yes, and siad this.. the Gun Advocate that he WAS... Cha Wednesday #30
Shouldn't everybody wait before calling it politically motivated? awesomerwb1 Wednesday #8
That's the correct and appropriate response. sop Wednesday #9
Democrats were not the ones who divided America bucolic_frolic Wednesday #13
How do we know it was political? Maybe he raped someones pet goat. Autumn Wednesday #18
Good on them, it's what they should be saying IMHO AZJonnie Wednesday #20
Im sick of hearing america was founded on difference of opinions Samael13 Wednesday #23
However abhorrent his rhetoric was, TheProle Wednesday #27
He was within his 1st Samael13 Wednesday #29
Kamala Harris Shrek Wednesday #24
NOW DO MARGE TWO TOES Nimble_Idea Wednesday #26
Ari's panel agrees with you malaise Wednesday #32
This message was self-deleted by its author malaise Wednesday #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Newsom and other prominen...»Reply #9