Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pat_k

(11,797 posts)
1. Did he happen to point out that the 47 regime is doing the opposite?
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 03:00 AM
17 hrs ago

If he didn't call out the fact that the hateful, divisive, incendiary talk is coming from the top -- from 47 and minions of the regime -- then fuck him.

Every Democrat calling for "universal rejection of violence" who does not point out the reality that it is NOT "both sides" who are fomenting division, is propagating a lie. When they speak, there is an implicit assumption they are speaking to "their own people," The corollary to that is that we need to be talked to because we are somehow being "out of line."

I don't think there is a single Democratic elected or leader who HAS NOT universally, repeatedly, and vehemently denounced political violence. So quit talking to "everybody" and talk directly to the ones who ARE OUT OF LINE.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»US must 'universally cond...»Reply #1