Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 2026 & 2028 elections... talk me down... [View all]Septua
(2,884 posts)19. Canceled elections not likely...
..but.
AI Overview (from a Google search)
Countries considered to be dictatorships or authoritarian regimes that still hold elections are often categorized as "electoral autocracies". In these systems, leaders use elections to claim legitimacy and project an image of democracy, even as they suppress opposition and limit freedoms.
Examples of countries with these characteristics include:
Azerbaijan: Elections are held, but the New Azerbaijan Party and the Aliyev family have maintained power for decades by restricting political competition and consistently winning with overwhelming majorities.
Belarus: The country holds elections, but they are widely seen as rigged. Civil liberties are heavily suppressed under President Alexander Lukashenka's authoritarian rule.
Cambodia: While constitutionally a multi-party state, the Cambodian People's Party has systematically dismantled meaningful opposition, effectively creating a one-party state.
Egypt: Since 2014, the government under President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi has restricted opposition and cracked down on dissent, while still holding elections.
Iran: Elections take place, but powerful unelected bodies, like the Guardian Council, control the process by vetting all candidates. This allows them to eliminate reformists and uphold the system of clerical rule.
Nicaragua: The Sandinista National Liberation Front has been accused of consolidating power by restricting political participation and disqualifying opposition leaders. Elections are still held, but are not considered free or fair.
Russia: President Vladimir Putin has used elections to legitimize his rule, but opposition candidates face systematic harassment and restrictions.
Singapore: Elections are held regularly, but the People's Action Party has maintained a dominant, one-party system for decades.
Tanzania: President Samia Suluhu Hassan and the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) party are expected to win future elections due to long-standing dominance.
Togo: In 2024, the government passed a new constitution that secures the president's power indefinitely, despite holding elections.
Turkey: Described as a "competitive authoritarian regime," Turkey holds elections where the ruling party uses state institutions to undermine political opponents.
Uganda: President Yoweri Museveni's regime holds elections, but the 2026 election is viewed as a contest between his dictatorship and an opposition movement facing severe restrictions.
Uzbekistan: Elections are held, but they lack genuine competition. The real opposition is often prevented from registering or participating.
Venezuela: The country holds elections, but they are often used to confuse voters and fragment the opposition, rather than serve as a fair or competitive democratic process.
This list is not exhaustive, and the level of authoritarian control in these countries can vary.
Countries considered to be dictatorships or authoritarian regimes that still hold elections are often categorized as "electoral autocracies". In these systems, leaders use elections to claim legitimacy and project an image of democracy, even as they suppress opposition and limit freedoms.
Examples of countries with these characteristics include:
Azerbaijan: Elections are held, but the New Azerbaijan Party and the Aliyev family have maintained power for decades by restricting political competition and consistently winning with overwhelming majorities.
Belarus: The country holds elections, but they are widely seen as rigged. Civil liberties are heavily suppressed under President Alexander Lukashenka's authoritarian rule.
Cambodia: While constitutionally a multi-party state, the Cambodian People's Party has systematically dismantled meaningful opposition, effectively creating a one-party state.
Egypt: Since 2014, the government under President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi has restricted opposition and cracked down on dissent, while still holding elections.
Iran: Elections take place, but powerful unelected bodies, like the Guardian Council, control the process by vetting all candidates. This allows them to eliminate reformists and uphold the system of clerical rule.
Nicaragua: The Sandinista National Liberation Front has been accused of consolidating power by restricting political participation and disqualifying opposition leaders. Elections are still held, but are not considered free or fair.
Russia: President Vladimir Putin has used elections to legitimize his rule, but opposition candidates face systematic harassment and restrictions.
Singapore: Elections are held regularly, but the People's Action Party has maintained a dominant, one-party system for decades.
Tanzania: President Samia Suluhu Hassan and the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) party are expected to win future elections due to long-standing dominance.
Togo: In 2024, the government passed a new constitution that secures the president's power indefinitely, despite holding elections.
Turkey: Described as a "competitive authoritarian regime," Turkey holds elections where the ruling party uses state institutions to undermine political opponents.
Uganda: President Yoweri Museveni's regime holds elections, but the 2026 election is viewed as a contest between his dictatorship and an opposition movement facing severe restrictions.
Uzbekistan: Elections are held, but they lack genuine competition. The real opposition is often prevented from registering or participating.
Venezuela: The country holds elections, but they are often used to confuse voters and fragment the opposition, rather than serve as a fair or competitive democratic process.
This list is not exhaustive, and the level of authoritarian control in these countries can vary.
Since Trump took office, we have witnessed a hostile and aggressive attempt by a President to take autocratic control of the government. And I'm confident he's determined to maintain GOP control of Congress to further his agenda. He can't afford to lose his power over the Congress...
He's broken all the rules, many of the laws, has no compunction to do otherwise and assumes the authority to do whatever he pleases. It doesn't take a lot of imagination to devise a scenario where he could fuck up the 2026 elections, in his favor.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
23 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

They aren't waiting for 2028. Next year there won't be an election either.
chicoescuela
19 hrs ago
#1
No evidence for that. They would have to try to go whole hog and suspend the Constitution, which would alienate
Bernardo de La Paz
18 hrs ago
#10
There were, what, 120 bomb threats in Pennsylvania and Georgia in the 2024 election?
BComplex
17 hrs ago
#15
Disruption is small scale in the scheme of things. There is lots to attend to.
Bernardo de La Paz
17 hrs ago
#16
There is absolutely zero evidence that elections can, or will be canceled
Fiendish Thingy
19 hrs ago
#4
Yes, they expect to have elections so they suppress votes any way they can. Worst is idea of birth names for women
Bernardo de La Paz
18 hrs ago
#9
Your Doomerism doesn't accurately reflect the inept incompetents currently in power
Fiendish Thingy
18 hrs ago
#12
I don't think Albacore said "put me down". I think he/she said "talk me down".
BComplex
17 hrs ago
#17
Behind the scenes, Republicons DO care and they are scared. In public they show bravado and lie, as they always do. . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
18 hrs ago
#6
There is no evidence for that. Only doomerism EXTRAPOLATION that sabotages Democrats. Please stop now. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
17 hrs ago
#18