Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Traildogbob

(12,141 posts)
11. I would say
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 03:14 PM
Thursday

Be prepared for lots of sub tossing at ICE raids, but not a good look while Americans are not being helped to eat. As Jesus demanded if ya believe those tells. Just good human rules, and passionate deeds, no special sky ghost needs to tell us to.
Maybe toss “rubber” subs like those squeaky rubber chicken toys. Imagine hundreds of em squeaking at the ICE thugs as an insult to this whole damn trial.
Is this the manlyism Kegsbreath and J Waters demand of men? Terrified of a sandwich while dressed and armed for war. They need some real war experiences, that shoot back and are not afraid of OUR courts.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Jury sending a message to Bondi, Pirro, Been A Dick Donald, etc.. MarineCombatEngineer Thursday #1
Yep BlueWaveNeverEnd Thursday #19
ding, this. AllaN01Bear Thursday #38
You can indict a ham sandwich but not convict it. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Thursday #2
Well, there we are. calimary Thursday #14
Jeanine "Winebox" Pirro will be having a liquid dinner and the walls will be drinking ketchup. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Thursday #18
You have a Way with Words, sir. calimary Thursday #37
Thx :) I can't claim credit for the middle name, but thirsty walls did occur to me in another thread. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Thursday #40
Pretty poor batting average so far. Ocelot II Thursday #3
This was about standing on a cement block. . . DinahMoeHum Thursday #27
So, a grand jury can indict a ham sandwich, but not a subway. Torchlight Thursday #4
Hah! UTUSN Thursday #6
DUzy malaise Thursday #7
From Joyce Vance LetMyPeopleVote Thursday #10
Isn't that more like mercuryblues Thursday #5
We spent how much money trying to prosecute Johonny Thursday #8
I hope somebody does that cost analyses Arazi Thursday #21
Some of the art that has appeared around the city honoring him LetMyPeopleVote Thursday #9
Jeanine Porto's office does the impossible AGAIN. underpants Thursday #31
Sean Dunn Super Hero Sandwich Guy! Cha Thursday #32
I would say Traildogbob Thursday #11
Perhaps Justice Brandeis Thursday #34
You are completely correct. Traildogbob Thursday #39
The whole thing has a "A Few Good Men" aura about it. Aristus Thursday #12
Uhhhh underpants Thursday #30
I noticed something about... Mike Nelson Thursday #13
Jamie Raskin on the sandwich guy: Kingofalldems Thursday #15
Sean C Dunn Super Hero Sandwich Guy! Cha Thursday #33
So smelling the onions didn't convince the jury? Go figure Raven123 Thursday #16
Watch for Subway to introduce . . . AverageOldGuy Thursday #17
Love it...but don't rush out to buy subway...the owner is evil. pecosbob Thursday #20
I don't buy from Subway, MarineCombatEngineer Thursday #23
Time makes the Italian hoagie "Person of the Year". yellowcanine Thursday #22
DUPE bif Thursday #24
I believe that only in Late Breaking News is this an issue here. ❤️ littlemissmartypants Thursday #25
You are correct. And this has been pointed out a number of times in different niyad Thursday #42
Sighhhhh. Once again, this is GD, not LBN. niyad Thursday #41
They couldn't hold the onions. littlemissmartypants Thursday #26
I just wish that instead of a sub it had been a burrito. rubbersole Thursday #28
If it had been a burrito, K. Noem would have it deported. MarineCombatEngineer Thursday #29
has the Subway web site crashed in response? DBoon Thursday #35
Lucky that wasn't Florida a guy killed someone for throwing popcorn at him, doc03 Thursday #36
Just sickening DiverDave Thursday #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»***Breaking *** DC Sandwi...»Reply #11