Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Celerity

(53,085 posts)
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 02:46 AM Nov 7

Zohran Mamdani's Win and the Price of Urban Life: Why City Voters Are Seeking Change [View all]



The soaring costs of city life appear to be sending urban voters toward progressive leaders who promise relief, both in the U.S. and globally.

https://www.socialeurope.eu/zohran-mamdanis-win-and-the-price-of-urban-life-why-city-voters-are-seeking-change



From New York to California and beyond, soaring costs seem to be rewriting city politics, as voters respond to candidates who promise to ease the financial squeeze. Zohran Mamdani’s historic win in NYC underscores a shift that has been emerging in recent years – both in the U.S. and globally – and could extend to other major cities.

For example, in Boston, progressive Democrat Michelle Wu, elected in 2021, ran on making city life more affordable with expanded tenant protections, investments in housing, and childcare support. Her most prominent challenger, Josh Kraft, son of Forbes 400 billionaire Robert Kraft, flamed out even before the election. Out west, Oakland’s progressive Democrat Barbara Lee, elected in 2025, focused on tackling homelessness and making housing and daycare more accessible for families. And in Chicago, democratic socialist Brandon Johnson, who took office in 2023, campaigned on “Green Social Housing” and other programs to lower living costs for working families.

Across these cities, the math is clear: when basic necessities like housing, childcare, and utility costs reach stratospheric levels, voters turn to leaders who offer solutions. These mayoral victories reflect the economic pressures impacting urban life and show why cost-of-living issues are now a defining feature of city politics. Let’s take a look at how these four cities – New York, Boston, Oakland, and Chicago – stack up in terms of costs.

When a One-Bedroom Costs a Fortune

Across the U.S., if you’re renting a one‑bedroom apartment, you’re looking at spending about $1,495 a month as of October 2025. But if you happen to live in one of the country’s pricier cities, that number skyrockets fast. In New York City, a simple one‑bedroom will set you back around $4,200 per month, almost three times the national average. Boston renters face similarly steep costs – one‑bedroom apartments in the city average about $3,455 per month. Over in Oakland, it’s about $1,830 per month, and Chicago clocks in at roughly $1,893 per month. The point is clear: if you’re renting in America’s major cities, you’re paying beyond what most renters pay across the country, and that housing squeeze helps explain why affordability is a defining issue in urban politics right now.

When Daycare Drains Your Wallet...................

snip
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Zohran Mamdani's Win and ...