Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Buckeyeblue

(6,112 posts)
16. It depends on his ability to connect in the primary
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 10:18 AM
Nov 7

He'll have to talk to voters in the south and midwest. He'll need to understand their priorities. California is very different from Michigan and South Carolina.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

As of today, that seems to be the case. tinrobot Nov 7 #1
Agree....I"m in MIchigan and some people are still talking about democratsruletheday Nov 7 #38
He may have positioned himself as an early frontrunner, but I think this pronouncement is quite premature tritsofme Nov 7 #2
Who else then? dem4decades Nov 7 #9
It's just too early, we don't know who will make the race. tritsofme Nov 7 #10
I agree it's early but he has shot out of the gate, everyone else is spinning their wheels. dem4decades Nov 7 #15
I don't think anyone can dispute his frontrunner status. tritsofme Nov 7 #19
JB Pritzker is at least neck and neck with Newsom atm Arazi Nov 7 #31
I second with JB. LuvLoogie Nov 7 #58
Anything can happen between now and then. Haggard Celine Nov 7 #3
The sad reality is that for the foreseeable future if we nominate another woman we'll lose again. Ocelot II Nov 7 #7
I agree with you, but I see events leading up Haggard Celine Nov 7 #11
It would help her cause to win a statewide election first. Certainly likely there will be an opportunity for her in the themaguffin Nov 7 #26
I think she'd make a great Senator. Haggard Celine Nov 7 #29
Too soon. But he's on a roll, for now. Ocelot II Nov 7 #4
One election at a time please Raven123 Nov 7 #5
Of course Bluetus Nov 7 #18
Pete is great, but no Bobstandard Nov 7 #20
I agree Johnny2X2X Nov 7 #6
absolutely.. agingdem Nov 7 #14
As crazy as it sounds I could see a Newsom-AOC ticket. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 7 #64
It's only 2025. nt Gore1FL Nov 7 #8
Well, he'd certainly get my vote. ananda Nov 7 #12
Read a bio of Newsome's wife and she seems amazingly sharp, fwiw. nt allegorical oracle Nov 7 #39
She's definitely a good one. ananda Nov 7 #54
Can't he go be a Senator or something? leftstreet Nov 7 #13
Sure he can Bobstandard Nov 7 #21
Probably not a Senator in CA though ITAL Nov 7 #46
It depends on his ability to connect in the primary Buckeyeblue Nov 7 #16
A strong contender for sure. BannonsLiver Nov 7 #17
I'd vote for him. Happy Hoosier Nov 7 #22
I like him (if we can't have a woman president). He will staff his admin. with progressive women and men who know what CTyankee Nov 7 #23
Hardly- way too early for a coronation Fiendish Thingy Nov 7 #24
Top 10? Aren't you Canadian? BannonsLiver Nov 7 #37
LOL, name 10. maxsolomon Nov 7 #53
Charisma is a pretty weak criteria for selecting a president, Doncha think? Fiendish Thingy Nov 7 #57
No, Charisma is the only thing that matters. maxsolomon Nov 7 #59
The 1992 election was George HW Bush's to lose in in 1991 themaguffin Nov 7 #25
I would like to see a Newsom/Buttigieg ticket pinkstarburst Nov 7 #27
Whoever the nominee is needs to take lessons from Newsom's PR team. In fact, ALL Democratic Scrivener7 Nov 7 #28
Not of he stays a centrist uponit7771 Nov 7 #30
The nation is centrist. elleng Nov 7 #42
Nope, issues of the left are more popular link uponit7771 Nov 7 #44
Why muddle this. Kamala is a Democrat, therefore "left." Nixie Nov 7 #60
How are you defining centrist? leftstreet Nov 7 #56
Agreed! Gavin's new nickname is G-DADDY, lol. Nixie Nov 7 #32
So the "inevitables" have started already? NNadir Nov 7 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author In It to Win It Nov 7 #34
For now, but 2.5 years is a long time in politics. He has to keep that momentum going for the next 2.5 years In It to Win It Nov 7 #35
2005 the nomination was definitely going to Clinton in 2008 EdmondDantes_ Nov 7 #36
A fine public servant, but don't forget elleng Nov 7 #40
The Primary debates will be interesting. Baitball Blogger Nov 7 #41
I truly hope democrats fix our debate setup before the primaries pinkstarburst Nov 7 #61
....and we'll spend a solid year talking about the high cost of living in California. BluesRunTheGame Nov 7 #43
Newsom & AOC ticket duckworth969 Nov 7 #45
like the guy's brass but he is a tad abrasive...yet so social media savvy. nt msongs Nov 7 #47
Abrasive is what we need Blaukraut Nov 7 #62
Wish I could vote for him, today. (nt) Paladin Nov 7 #48
A lot can happen in three years, but if it's Newsom, hamsterjill Nov 7 #49
That election is more than two years away. Can we focus on our current battles? Reader Rabbit Nov 7 #50
Yes, 2028 Ain't Tomorrow. Yes, Pete, Jon O., Shapiro, Pritzker.. ColoringFool Nov 7 #51
In my mind - it's not too early to get the Dems to coalesce radicalleft Nov 7 #52
I agree with your assessment senseandsensibility Nov 7 #55
Maybe but tomorrow is never guaranteed on anything Tribetime Nov 7 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The nomination is Gavin ...»Reply #16