Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Reader Rabbit

(2,742 posts)
50. That election is more than two years away. Can we focus on our current battles?
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 02:13 PM
Friday

I feel like looking all they way ahead to 2028 is very premature.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

As of today, that seems to be the case. tinrobot Friday #1
Agree....I"m in MIchigan and some people are still talking about democratsruletheday Friday #38
He may have positioned himself as an early frontrunner, but I think this pronouncement is quite premature tritsofme Friday #2
Who else then? dem4decades Friday #9
It's just too early, we don't know who will make the race. tritsofme Friday #10
I agree it's early but he has shot out of the gate, everyone else is spinning their wheels. dem4decades Friday #15
I don't think anyone can dispute his frontrunner status. tritsofme Friday #19
JB Pritzker is at least neck and neck with Newsom atm Arazi Friday #31
I second with JB. LuvLoogie Friday #58
Anything can happen between now and then. Haggard Celine Friday #3
The sad reality is that for the foreseeable future if we nominate another woman we'll lose again. Ocelot II Friday #7
I agree with you, but I see events leading up Haggard Celine Friday #11
It would help her cause to win a statewide election first. Certainly likely there will be an opportunity for her in the themaguffin Friday #26
I think she'd make a great Senator. Haggard Celine Friday #29
Too soon. But he's on a roll, for now. Ocelot II Friday #4
One election at a time please Raven123 Friday #5
Of course Bluetus Friday #18
Pete is great, but no Bobstandard Friday #20
I agree Johnny2X2X Friday #6
absolutely.. agingdem Friday #14
As crazy as it sounds I could see a Newsom-AOC ticket. DemocratSinceBirth Friday #64
It's only 2025. nt Gore1FL Friday #8
Well, he'd certainly get my vote. ananda Friday #12
Read a bio of Newsome's wife and she seems amazingly sharp, fwiw. nt allegorical oracle Friday #39
She's definitely a good one. ananda Friday #54
Can't he go be a Senator or something? leftstreet Friday #13
Sure he can Bobstandard Friday #21
Probably not a Senator in CA though ITAL Friday #46
It depends on his ability to connect in the primary Buckeyeblue Friday #16
A strong contender for sure. BannonsLiver Friday #17
I'd vote for him. Happy Hoosier Friday #22
I like him (if we can't have a woman president). He will staff his admin. with progressive women and men who know what CTyankee Friday #23
Hardly- way too early for a coronation Fiendish Thingy Friday #24
Top 10? Aren't you Canadian? BannonsLiver Friday #37
LOL, name 10. maxsolomon Friday #53
Charisma is a pretty weak criteria for selecting a president, Doncha think? Fiendish Thingy Friday #57
No, Charisma is the only thing that matters. maxsolomon Friday #59
The 1992 election was George HW Bush's to lose in in 1991 themaguffin Friday #25
I would like to see a Newsom/Buttigieg ticket pinkstarburst Friday #27
Whoever the nominee is needs to take lessons from Newsom's PR team. In fact, ALL Democratic Scrivener7 Friday #28
Not of he stays a centrist uponit7771 Friday #30
The nation is centrist. elleng Friday #42
Nope, issues of the left are more popular link uponit7771 Friday #44
Why muddle this. Kamala is a Democrat, therefore "left." Nixie Friday #60
How are you defining centrist? leftstreet Friday #56
Agreed! Gavin's new nickname is G-DADDY, lol. Nixie Friday #32
So the "inevitables" have started already? NNadir Friday #33
This message was self-deleted by its author In It to Win It Friday #34
For now, but 2.5 years is a long time in politics. He has to keep that momentum going for the next 2.5 years In It to Win It Friday #35
2005 the nomination was definitely going to Clinton in 2008 EdmondDantes_ Friday #36
A fine public servant, but don't forget elleng Friday #40
The Primary debates will be interesting. Baitball Blogger Friday #41
I truly hope democrats fix our debate setup before the primaries pinkstarburst Friday #61
....and we'll spend a solid year talking about the high cost of living in California. BluesRunTheGame Friday #43
Newsom & AOC ticket duckworth969 Friday #45
like the guy's brass but he is a tad abrasive...yet so social media savvy. nt msongs Friday #47
Abrasive is what we need Blaukraut Friday #62
Wish I could vote for him, today. (nt) Paladin Friday #48
A lot can happen in three years, but if it's Newsom, hamsterjill Friday #49
That election is more than two years away. Can we focus on our current battles? Reader Rabbit Friday #50
Yes, 2028 Ain't Tomorrow. Yes, Pete, Jon O., Shapiro, Pritzker.. ColoringFool Friday #51
In my mind - it's not too early to get the Dems to coalesce radicalleft Friday #52
I agree with your assessment senseandsensibility Friday #55
Maybe but tomorrow is never guaranteed on anything Tribetime Friday #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The nomination is Gavin ...»Reply #50