Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

WestMichRad

(2,786 posts)

8. Following the recent practice of SCOTUS,

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Fri Nov 7, 2025, 08:25 PM

Friday

… I sort of expect them to send this back to a lower court for a full hearing, and issue an injunction blocking the court order that SNAP benefits be funded. The six justice majority doesn’t give a shit whether people will be harmed in the meantime. The Unitary executive fantasy takes priority with them.

Sure hoping that I’m wrong!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

GrapesOfWrath

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

JUST IN: The Trump administration asks the Supreme Court to stop -- by 9:30 tonight -- the court orders requiring payment [View all] riversedge Friday OP

Is this another one that THIS SC will decide within 24 hours? bluestarone Friday #1

We must stop hungry people from eating. It's an emergency! newdeal2 Friday #2

Evil. 2MuchNoise Friday #3

It's a national emergency. Hungry children might get food tomorrow. Irish_Dem Friday #4

Who else has been starving children as a war tactic? Irish_Dem Friday #5

Could he be anymore Scrooge than that? Tree Lady Friday #6

Can give $40 billion to Argintina, but bluestarone Friday #7

Following the recent practice of SCOTUS, WestMichRad Friday #8