Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Steve Vladeck explains Jackson's temporary stay on the SNAP case [View all]RandomNumbers
(18,986 posts)19. Your knee jerk reflexes are working well. Here's the important part -
(from the link in the OP)
In an order circulated to the Courts press corps at 9:17 p.m. ET, Jackson issued the administrative stay sought by the Trump administration. But her order says a lot more than the typical administrative staywhich usually contains nothing other than boilerplate. As Jackson wrote, Given the First Circuits representations, an administrative stay is required to facilitate the First Circuits expeditious resolution of the pending stay motion. Thus, she stayed the two orders from Judge McConnell pending disposition of the motion for a stay pending appeal in the First Circuit, or further order of Justice Jackson or of the Court. And as the order concludes, This administrative stay will terminate forty-eight hours after the First Circuits resolution of the pending motion, which the First Circuit is expected to issue with dispatch.
The first thing to say about this order is that Ive never seen anything quite like it before. Circuit Justices dont usually explain administrative stays, and certainly not with this much detail about the timing. Here, Justice Jackson is clearly telling the First Circuit to hustlea message I am sure the court of appeals will receive and act upon.
As for why Justice Jackson did it, to me, the clue is the last sentence. Had Jackson refused to issue an administrative stay, its entirely possible (indeed, she may already have known) that a majority of her colleagues were ready to do it themselves. I still think that this is what happened back in April when the full Court intervened shortly before 1 a.m., without explaining why Justice Alito hadnt, in the A.A.R.P. Alien Enemies Act case. And from Jacksons perspective, an administrative stay from the full Court wouldve been worsealmost certainly because it would have been open-ended (that is, it would not have had a deadline). The upshot wouldve been that Judge McConnells order couldve remained frozen indefinitely while the full Court took its time. Yesterdays grant of a stay in Trump v. Orr, for instance, came 48 days after the Justice Department first sought emergency relief.
Instead, by keeping the case for herself and granting the same relief, in contrast, Justice Jackson was able to directly influence the timing in both the First Circuit and the Supreme Court, at least for now. She nudged the First Circuit (which I expect to rule by the end of the weekend, Monday at the latest); and, assuming that court rules against the Trump administration, she also tied her colleagues handsby having her administrative stay expire 48 hours after the First Circuit rules. Of course, the full Court can extend the administrative stay (and Jackson can do it herself). But this way, at least, shes putting pressure on everyonethe First Circuit and the full Courtto move very quickly in deciding whether or not Judge McConnells orders should be allowed to go into effect. From where Im sitting, thats why Justice Jackson, the most vocal critic among the justices of the Courts behavior in Trump-related emergency applications, ruled herself hererather than allowing the full Court to overrule her. It drastically increases the odds of the full Supreme Court resolving this issue by the end of next weekone way or the other.
The first thing to say about this order is that Ive never seen anything quite like it before. Circuit Justices dont usually explain administrative stays, and certainly not with this much detail about the timing. Here, Justice Jackson is clearly telling the First Circuit to hustlea message I am sure the court of appeals will receive and act upon.
As for why Justice Jackson did it, to me, the clue is the last sentence. Had Jackson refused to issue an administrative stay, its entirely possible (indeed, she may already have known) that a majority of her colleagues were ready to do it themselves. I still think that this is what happened back in April when the full Court intervened shortly before 1 a.m., without explaining why Justice Alito hadnt, in the A.A.R.P. Alien Enemies Act case. And from Jacksons perspective, an administrative stay from the full Court wouldve been worsealmost certainly because it would have been open-ended (that is, it would not have had a deadline). The upshot wouldve been that Judge McConnells order couldve remained frozen indefinitely while the full Court took its time. Yesterdays grant of a stay in Trump v. Orr, for instance, came 48 days after the Justice Department first sought emergency relief.
Instead, by keeping the case for herself and granting the same relief, in contrast, Justice Jackson was able to directly influence the timing in both the First Circuit and the Supreme Court, at least for now. She nudged the First Circuit (which I expect to rule by the end of the weekend, Monday at the latest); and, assuming that court rules against the Trump administration, she also tied her colleagues handsby having her administrative stay expire 48 hours after the First Circuit rules. Of course, the full Court can extend the administrative stay (and Jackson can do it herself). But this way, at least, shes putting pressure on everyonethe First Circuit and the full Courtto move very quickly in deciding whether or not Judge McConnells orders should be allowed to go into effect. From where Im sitting, thats why Justice Jackson, the most vocal critic among the justices of the Courts behavior in Trump-related emergency applications, ruled herself hererather than allowing the full Court to overrule her. It drastically increases the odds of the full Supreme Court resolving this issue by the end of next weekone way or the other.
Point being, - kids may be hungry next week, but instead of being hungry indefinitely while the the Trump SC dawdles, there will be a decision much more quickly, with a good chance of it going to get the kids fed.
That said, if you aren't starving yourself and haven't donated to a food bank yet - please do that.
KBJ is not the problem here. The problem is the EVIL that is currently running this country.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations