Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SunSeeker

(57,216 posts)
19. Jackson is not a SCOTUS lackey; she did it to avoid a longer stay by the full Court.
Sat Nov 8, 2025, 01:47 PM
Saturday

All emergency applications are filed in the first instance with the “Circuit Justice” assigned to that particular court of appeals/geographic area. For the Boston-based First Circuit, that’s Justice Jackson. And with one equivocal exception, every “administrative” stay of which I’m aware has come from the Circuit Justice, not the full Court. Thus, the onus was on Justice Jackson to either enter the administrative stay herself, or risk being overruled by the full Court.
...
As for why Justice Jackson did it, to me, the clue is the last sentence. Had Jackson refused to issue an administrative stay, it’s entirely possible (indeed, she may already have known) that a majority of her colleagues were ready to do it themselves. I still think that this is what happened back in April when the full Court intervened shortly before 1 a.m., without explaining why Justice Alito hadn’t, in the A.A.R.P. Alien Enemies Act case. And from Jackson’s perspective, an administrative stay from the full Court would’ve been worse—almost certainly because it would have been open-ended (that is, it would not have had a deadline). The upshot would’ve been that Judge McConnell’s order could’ve remained frozen indefinitely while the full Court took its time. Yesterday’s grant of a stay in Trump v. Orr, for instance, came 48 days after the Justice Department first sought emergency relief.

Instead, by keeping the case for herself and granting the same relief, in contrast, Justice Jackson was able to directly influence the timing in both the First Circuit and the Supreme Court, at least for now. She nudged the First Circuit (which I expect to rule by the end of the weekend, Monday at the latest); and, assuming that court rules against the Trump administration, she also tied her colleagues’ hands—by having her administrative stay expire 48 hours after the First Circuit rules. Of course, the full Court can extend the administrative stay (and Jackson can do it herself). But this way, at least, she’s putting pressure on everyone—the First Circuit and the full Court—to move very quickly in deciding whether or not Judge McConnell’s orders should be allowed to go into effect. From where I’m sitting, that’s why Justice Jackson, the most vocal critic among the justices of the Court’s behavior in Trump-related emergency applications, ruled herself here—rather than allowing the full Court to overrule her. It drastically increases the odds of the full Supreme Court resolving this issue by the end of next week—one way or the other.https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/190-snap-wtf

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A decision by the 1st Circuit is expected within days. Ocelot II Saturday #1
Justice Jackson is no "lackey" FBaggins Saturday #2
I've had a loss in the family and out of the loop . Why did she go for a pause? What was her reasoning? Autumn Saturday #3
There are numerous threads explaining why she did this, MarineCombatEngineer Saturday #5
Thanks. She is not one to roll over. Autumn Saturday #20
She set a 48 hour deadline instead of the full conservative court leaving an open deadline. Lars39 Saturday #7
You are right. She did what she could to somewhat still maintain control over the sutuation. W_HAMILTON Saturday #8
So you think Justice Jackson is a lackey? MarineCombatEngineer Saturday #4
Agreed. In her short time, she has shown that she is no lackey newdeal2 Saturday #9
The governor of Wisconsin got it done before the pause. milestogo Saturday #6
Here, maybe this will help you understand why Justice Jackson is no "lackey". MarineCombatEngineer Saturday #10
Somehow there is always a reason angrychair Saturday #12
So you think she's a lackey also? MarineCombatEngineer Saturday #13
I'm sure the reason sounds good angrychair Saturday #14
She did not decide nah, MarineCombatEngineer Saturday #15
I read it angrychair Saturday #17
Understood, the anger is justified at the whole situation. MarineCombatEngineer Saturday #18
One thing is for sure angrychair Saturday #11
i get so sick of the endless pearl clutching CatWoman Saturday #16
Jackson is not a SCOTUS lackey; she did it to avoid a longer stay by the full Court. SunSeeker Saturday #19
Thank you. To you, and other posters that actual bother to read and understand ... stopdiggin Saturday #23
And the answer is ... The delay/suspension could very well have been made permanenet stopdiggin Saturday #21
You are incorrect. mcar Saturday #22
It's just a procedural book-keeping 48 hour delay. It keeps the overall process lindysalsagal Saturday #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Last night Scotus lackeys...»Reply #19