Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

stopdiggin

(14,693 posts)

21. And the answer is ... The delay/suspension could very well have been made permanenet

Reply to vapor2 (Original post)

Sat Nov 8, 2025, 01:57 PM

Saturday

(at the hands of a very conservative court) - were it not for the yeoman efforts made by the very few liberal voices on that panel.

So ... let's try this ... "Liberals on the bench - fighting tooth and nail to make something potentially very bad, slightly less bad by assigning it temporary status." (and winning with those rearguard efforts)

Hope that helps.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

MarineCombatEngineer

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Last night Scotus lackeys approved a pause in SNAP funds [View all] vapor2 Saturday OP

A decision by the 1st Circuit is expected within days. Ocelot II Saturday #1

Justice Jackson is no "lackey" FBaggins Saturday #2

I've had a loss in the family and out of the loop . Why did she go for a pause? What was her reasoning? Autumn Saturday #3

There are numerous threads explaining why she did this, MarineCombatEngineer Saturday #5

Thanks. She is not one to roll over. Autumn Saturday #20

She set a 48 hour deadline instead of the full conservative court leaving an open deadline. Lars39 Saturday #7

You are right. She did what she could to somewhat still maintain control over the sutuation. W_HAMILTON Saturday #8

So you think Justice Jackson is a lackey? MarineCombatEngineer Saturday #4

Agreed. In her short time, she has shown that she is no lackey newdeal2 Saturday #9

The governor of Wisconsin got it done before the pause. milestogo Saturday #6

Here, maybe this will help you understand why Justice Jackson is no "lackey". MarineCombatEngineer Saturday #10

Somehow there is always a reason angrychair Saturday #12

So you think she's a lackey also? MarineCombatEngineer Saturday #13

I'm sure the reason sounds good angrychair Saturday #14

She did not decide nah, MarineCombatEngineer Saturday #15

I read it angrychair Saturday #17

Understood, the anger is justified at the whole situation. MarineCombatEngineer Saturday #18

One thing is for sure angrychair Saturday #11

i get so sick of the endless pearl clutching CatWoman Saturday #16

Jackson is not a SCOTUS lackey; she did it to avoid a longer stay by the full Court. SunSeeker Saturday #19

Thank you. To you, and other posters that actual bother to read and understand ... stopdiggin Saturday #23

And the answer is ... The delay/suspension could very well have been made permanenet stopdiggin Saturday #21

You are incorrect. mcar Saturday #22

It's just a procedural book-keeping 48 hour delay. It keeps the overall process lindysalsagal Saturday #24