Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why Does Schumer Keep Trying to Cave? [View all]W_HAMILTON
(9,868 posts)44. WRONG. And the article is outdated, but since we are linking the previously referenced fascist friendly outlet:
...
The offer came after days of intense discussions on the Democratic side about the possibility of an off-ramp. Democrats had been demanding an extension of the ACA credits as a condition of reopening the government, but as the pain being caused by the shutdown intensified, a debate emerged between progressives and moderate-leaning members over whether to accept an offer from Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.).
That blueprint included a vote on a CR until January, and attached the minibus and a commitment to hold a vote to extend the ACA subsidies.
Talks continued until midday Thursday, when Democrats decided over lunch to unify behind a single plan by the party, which Schumer finally unveiled.
The offer came after days of intense discussions on the Democratic side about the possibility of an off-ramp. Democrats had been demanding an extension of the ACA credits as a condition of reopening the government, but as the pain being caused by the shutdown intensified, a debate emerged between progressives and moderate-leaning members over whether to accept an offer from Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.).
That blueprint included a vote on a CR until January, and attached the minibus and a commitment to hold a vote to extend the ACA subsidies.
Talks continued until midday Thursday, when Democrats decided over lunch to unify behind a single plan by the party, which Schumer finally unveiled.
Taken from: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5595545-schumer-plan-government-shutdown/
The shitty plan was THUNE'S offer -- NOT the handful of Democrats that are doing the negotiating and NOT Schumer's. And it was roundly rejected by the Democratic caucus as a whole, which then agreed to support Schumer's counteroffer, which he announced on the Senate floor in the speech I linked the video of in my other post.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
B/c he is never punished for his failures and capitulations with a loss of position.
RockRaven
Saturday
#1
5 yrs of pachyderm filbusters and then he changed the rules 2013 5th yr of Obama's presidency.
GreenWave
Sunday
#53
He wants a deal , even a bad deal to pretend that he still knows what he's doing
Bread and Circuses
Saturday
#4
There's talk from House reps that he's more concerned for the airline industry that are screaming to end the shutdown
pecosbob
Saturday
#6
This propaganda piece from the left damn near has me breaking my pledge to never link to a certain website.
W_HAMILTON
Saturday
#8
The article is a biased piece of shit. It was not a negotiated deal by Democrats, much less Schumer.
W_HAMILTON
Saturday
#11
disagree with your framing attempts, as it was a group of centrist Dems who floated the idea (most Dems said NO) to
Celerity
Saturday
#12
WRONG. And the article is outdated, but since we are linking the previously referenced fascist friendly outlet:
W_HAMILTON
Sunday
#44
Good fuckin question!! We're FINALLY startin to win again and Schumer is lookin to capitulate?? HELL NO!!!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Saturday
#13
The assignment is to put "cave" in as many headlines about Democrats, especially Schumer, as possible.
betsuni
Saturday
#20
Did you read that article? Because even it directly refutes the bullshit article in the OP.
W_HAMILTON
Sunday
#47
I've seen posts on DU where people seem to have this fantasy that we can keep the government shut down for several more
Midwestern Democrat
Sunday
#45