Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

gulliver

(13,639 posts)

15. Thanks

Reply to Nanjeanne (Reply #12)

Sun Nov 9, 2025, 03:35 PM

Sunday

To try to explain, I think you're "conceding" that there's such a high likelihood that I'm right that it's not worth it for you to do research on your own to respond to the points I listed. Lacking an objection to them, I take it you agree with me on them.

If you're looking for differences of "policy" of these women with Mamdani, I don't actually want to argue over them. There are obvious ones, but why risk unity by rubbing them in. Unity is important and the Democratic Party is.

Other posters note that each locale is different. And I agree. I just happen to think the victories of these two women who are governors-elect and who won top statewide office should outweigh the results of a city mayoral election. Their influence on our strategy should predominate. To me, I'm just afraid that's obvious.

It seems obvious anyway. If you don't find it so, we can agree to disagree.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Cha

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Spanberger and Sherril show the way. [View all] gulliver Sunday OP

Not true across the board LearnedHand Sunday #1

No disagreement. gulliver Sunday #2

Can you explain to me what Spanberger supports that, let's say, Mamdani would not. Or Nanjeanne Sunday #3

This right here leftstreet Sunday #4

You'll trust your own research more than me gulliver Sunday #6

I just assumed since you said THEY were the Nanjeanne Sunday #7

Check me on these things. gulliver Sunday #8

I have no idea what you are talking about since Nanjeanne Sunday #9

I'll take that as a concession gulliver Sunday #10

You can take it however you want. I have no idea what you think I conceded or what you are arguing with me about. Nanjeanne Sunday #12

Thanks gulliver Sunday #15

OMG. There are no words! Nanjeanne Sunday #16

Bravo! I have some Info on the Govs Sherrill & Cha Sunday #19

here are some of Spanberger's political positions that probably would not have been supported by Mamdani Celerity Sunday #17

These were votes in Congress. I asked what did she run on that was a moderate policy that wouldn't be supported? Nanjeanne Sunday #18

When a candidate runs for office, their past votes and/or stances are looked at by the voters. The votes and/or stances Celerity Sunday #20

I agree. You are saying what I've been saying continuously. I reject that it's Spanberger and Sherrill and the Nanjeanne Sunday #22

+2 Emile Sunday #11

Spanberger doesn't support rent control for example which Mamdani does. EdmondDantes_ Sunday #14

Thank you for pointing out some differences in policies. I haven't seen anything Spanberger has said about rent control Nanjeanne Sunday #21

All politics are local fujiyamasan Sunday #5

These questions or debates or whatever BootinUp Sunday #13

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Spanberger and Sherril sh...»Reply #15