Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nanjeanne

(6,480 posts)
18. These were votes in Congress. I asked what did she run on that was a moderate policy that wouldn't be supported?
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 05:42 PM
Sunday

Once in Congress - there are many reasons why people do things, etc. If the media and others are going to talk about Spanberger as a way to campaign going forward - I am interested to know how she campaigned that wasn't on the same policies that progressives would run on. My point is that media may fall into the "moderate" is the way to win elections as opposed to the "progressive" is the way to win elections. Or Mamdani could only win in NYC and Spanberger wouldn't win in NYC yada yada yada. It's a waste of time.

We WON these elections - not simply because Trump is destroying the country - although that has much to do with it. But I'd also like to think we WON so many places because the policies that were run on were affordability and compassion and justice. That's not progressive and that's not moderate. It's Democratic. And not equivocating. And speaking plainly. And running with optimism. And vision. That's a winning strategy. And we do not win when we run on "moderation".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not true across the board LearnedHand Sunday #1
No disagreement. gulliver Sunday #2
Can you explain to me what Spanberger supports that, let's say, Mamdani would not. Or Nanjeanne Sunday #3
This right here leftstreet Sunday #4
You'll trust your own research more than me gulliver Sunday #6
I just assumed since you said THEY were the Nanjeanne Sunday #7
Check me on these things. gulliver Sunday #8
I have no idea what you are talking about since Nanjeanne Sunday #9
I'll take that as a concession gulliver Sunday #10
You can take it however you want. I have no idea what you think I conceded or what you are arguing with me about. Nanjeanne Sunday #12
Thanks gulliver Sunday #15
OMG. There are no words! Nanjeanne Sunday #16
Bravo! I have some Info on the Govs Sherrill & Cha Sunday #19
here are some of Spanberger's political positions that probably would not have been supported by Mamdani Celerity Sunday #17
These were votes in Congress. I asked what did she run on that was a moderate policy that wouldn't be supported? Nanjeanne Sunday #18
When a candidate runs for office, their past votes and/or stances are looked at by the voters. The votes and/or stances Celerity Sunday #20
I agree. You are saying what I've been saying continuously. I reject that it's Spanberger and Sherrill and the Nanjeanne Sunday #22
+2 Emile Sunday #11
Spanberger doesn't support rent control for example which Mamdani does. EdmondDantes_ Sunday #14
Thank you for pointing out some differences in policies. I haven't seen anything Spanberger has said about rent control Nanjeanne Sunday #21
All politics are local fujiyamasan Sunday #5
These questions or debates or whatever BootinUp Sunday #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Spanberger and Sherril sh...»Reply #18