Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

muriel_volestrangler

(105,193 posts)
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 08:12 AM Monday

Another possible reason for the 8 caving: to preserve the filibuster [View all]

Since I'm not American, I can't say how credible this is, but Lemieux at Lawyers, Guns and Money is a good commentator, and Yglesias, while he can be a prick, can make important points - hadn't seen it said here, so putting it in a thread for discussion:

I agree with Matt that this the critical to understanding what the pro-capitulation Dem senators were thinking. (And given that nobody facing re-election in 2026 voted for Trump here, it’s clear support within the caucus was greater than the number of votes cast, and the most plausible inference is that Schumer also supported it.)




"The subtext of this whole fight is the filibuster.

Dems were winning the blame game and could have held out indefinitely, but they weren’t going to win adequate policy concessions from Trump — eventually Rs would’ve been forced to nuke.

Fine by me, but many Senators disagree.

I think the decision to cave is dumb, but people should understand what was really in play and not take every politician’s outraged statement too seriously or literally."

It makes perfect sense that Republicans were desperate to not have to use the nuclear option here — they don’t want to take full responsibility for policies most people hate, they don’t care about democratic values, and this particular anti-democratic rule favors reactionary interests in the long run. For Democrats to cave to save the filibuster, conversely, is just a lose-lose-lose proposition.

https://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2025/11/fear-of-a-less-undemocratic-senate

I certainly can't see that SNAP was a sufficient reason, since the courts were firmly on the "must be paid, by law" side. And the flight cancellations would be a pathetic reason to give in - Republicans were getting the blame, and Duffy announced the cancellations, so they'd get it for those too.
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Another possible reason f...