Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

QueerDuck

(651 posts)
14. The diversity within our party may be a point of pride and a moral strength, but politically speaking...
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 09:40 AM
Nov 10

The diversity within our party may be a point of pride and a moral strength, but politically speaking, disunity is a glaring liability. I do take your point, but I'm going to quibble with you just a bit.

To defeat the highly disciplined GOP, loyalty and functional unity are paramount. Our 'diversity' often manifests as counterproductive emotionalism: voters heavily influenced by feelings or pride who demand perfection and punish the party for being 'less than ideal.'

The mistaken belief that abstaining or voting third-party pulls the party leftward, when in reality it often forces the party rightward to recover votes from other demographics, is politically naive. None of these self-defeating behaviors can be considered a strength.

I constantly hear demands for 'leadership to lead' and for the party to 'do something NOW' (even when we aren't in power, these unrealistic calls persist.) Yet, I rarely hear calls for more unity, loyalty, realism, and a better understanding of political reality. Tantrums and disloyalty do not win elections. Politics is ugly and frustrating, but we need functional cohesion to achieve our goals. Disunity and abandonment are not winning strategies.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Think we can still hammer them on ACA without kids hungry, paychecks held, permanent job losses, etc. Silent Type Nov 10 #1
Absolutely! pat_k Nov 10 #3
So we made people suffer angrychair Nov 10 #5
That's certainly one way to look at it. pat_k Nov 10 #6
No angrychair Nov 10 #7
If Dems had gotten their demand on the ACA subsidies and nothing else Deminpenn Nov 10 #8
Yes angrychair Nov 10 #10
It's ok that you're a single issue voter Deminpenn Nov 10 #11
You miss the point friend angrychair Nov 10 #13
Some perspective from Lawrence O'Donnell pat_k Nov 11 #21
Thanks for looking at the potentially positive aspects. yellow dahlia Nov 10 #2
And keep pushing our electeds. Old dogs, new tricks and all that. pat_k Nov 10 #4
Even better, now Johnson has to call the House back into session Deminpenn Nov 10 #9
They have set a precedent Bettie Nov 10 #12
There is a chance for the 8 to redeem themselves in the coming battle. pat_k Nov 10 #20
The diversity within our party may be a point of pride and a moral strength, but politically speaking... QueerDuck Nov 10 #14
All true. While diversity in the party is a strength pat_k Nov 10 #17
I think this is BS. But he has a chance to prove it. Happy Hoosier Nov 10 #15
As I said, time will tell. pat_k Nov 10 #16
Nancy Pelosi was pretty damn good at keeping her coalition together. Nanjeanne Nov 10 #18
Yes. But she utterly failed to stand strong for her convictions. pat_k Nov 10 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Herding Democrats is TOUG...»Reply #14