General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So what was the point? [View all]summer_in_TX
(3,926 posts)A psychopathic autocrat who absolutely does not care about those who were and will be suffering. The Supreme Court was not guaranteed to order the restoration of SNAP benefits.
All they had were awful choices. Ending the shutdown now to prevent adults, seniors, and children from starving now, forced into bankruptcy, possibly losing their homes, and the trauma that economic upheaval causes to families and marriages. Or skyrocketing insurance premiums with many losing health insurance, some with pre-existing conditions, medical bankruptcies, some with losing their homes. They voted to end the one that involved starvation. They did gain attention on the skyrocketing health insurance premiums, as well as the Big Ugly Bill and its consequences. Plus Trump has been exposed as someone who will use hunger to compel people to bend the knee.
But I feel for the Senators. This kind of moral dilemma is devastating to have to consider, with no least-bad options.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=20789989