General Discussion

tritsofme

(19,733 posts)

9. If you care for my opinion, it's that if the shutdown should have happened at all, it shouldn't have lasted more than a

Reply to Post removed (Reply #8)

Tue Nov 11, 2025, 01:52 PM

Tuesday

week.

Historically, no party forcing a shutdown has ever had its demands met, this time was destined to be no different.

If Republicans are determined to strip health insurance from millions of Americans, that’s something they’ll have to defend before voters.

What is the point of punishing federal workers indefinitely while SNAP families live in fear as Trump tries to starve them?

But I assume the lack of engagement on the actual topic of the OP means you are leaving that bit of goofiness behind?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Real Question about The Great Surrender [View all] Mr.WeRP Tuesday OP

No. Why would you think such a routine procedural action was related to shutdown negotiations? tritsofme Tuesday #1

Let's be real. Nothing is normal when it comes to Trump's legal battles Mr.WeRP Tuesday #2

Really? I didn't read any serious legal analysis that described her stay as anything but routine. tritsofme Tuesday #3

You sound like a Garland apologist Mr.WeRP Tuesday #4

Sorry to interrupt the creative speculation session. tritsofme Tuesday #5

That's every day here lol Mr.WeRP Tuesday #6

You are all over the place. As to OP, still not sure why you think Justice Jackson's actions were anything but routine tritsofme Tuesday #7

Post removed Post removed Tuesday #8

If you care for my opinion, it's that if the shutdown should have happened at all, it shouldn't have lasted more than a tritsofme Tuesday #9