Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: As a Party, how do we distance ourselves from 50 year mortgages under Trump while we embraced 40 year loans under Obama? [View all]pat_k
(12,461 posts)6. I never embraced 40 year mortgages
If the small reduction in payment makes such a difference, you cannot afford the house. Subjecting yourself to 10 or 20 years of additional payments and tens of thousands more in interest is a very, very bad deal in any book I know of.
Consider this:
A homeowner with a 30-year, 6.4% $400,000 mortgage owes $2,502 per month for a total cost of $900,729 over the life of the loan.
If that homeowner has Obamacare their health insurance will go up at least $800.
Trump's solution to affordability: Get that family a 50 year mortgage!!
With a 50-year loan at 6.4% our homeowner's payments would be $2,225 a month for a total cost of $1,334,877.
So, instead of paying $2,502 per month on a 30 year mortgage, they are paying $2,225.
Oh goody, they have a whooping $277 to put toward that $800 health insurance increase. And all this at a cost of a mere $434,148 and 20 additional years of payments.
Does he really think people will get all excited over the prospect of shoveling hundreds of thousands more dollars in the pockets of banks for the privilege of squeezing expenses down a couple hundred dollars -- dollars that won't even begin to offset the costs of health insurance, electricity (no more clean energy subsidies), groceries, and every other necessity?
On edit:
I am an old fogy, but my approach to taking on debt is that I put enough down to make the payment so manageable that I can make larger payments with regularity, and only have limit myself to regularly scheduled payments when some emergency or unexpected expense leaves me short.
If I can't put that much down, I need to downsize the purchase.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
As a Party, how do we distance ourselves from 50 year mortgages under Trump while we embraced 40 year loans under Obama? [View all]
PeaceWave
Tuesday
OP
50 year mortgages are like reverse mortgages. No one should use them unless absolutely necessary. But agree with post.
Silent Type
Tuesday
#3
Yes,reverse M's tack on a lot of fees that eventually eat up all your equity, they are one of the worst bankster scams,.
yaesu
Tuesday
#7
10 year difference. We don't have adequate renovation programs. The homes are too BIG.
bucolic_frolic
Tuesday
#9
I'm mainly just complaining about the bullshit self-aggrandizement of putting Trump on a sign with FDR
AZJonnie
Tuesday
#12
40 year loans were not widely embraced under Obama. And Obama himself clearly did not embrace them.
Wiz Imp
Tuesday
#17
The way we do it is to propose a national credit union that will make SIMPLE INTEREST home loans
Volaris
Tuesday
#19
Which is why I find it disturbing that anyone on our side would be advocating against such options...
PeaceWave
Tuesday
#21
It's a quesiton of affordability. So either fix wages or fix real property prices.
flvegan
Tuesday
#22
Yes, a 50 year mortgage and the amount of interest paid over that period is insane.
CentralMass
Tuesday
#28