Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(8,140 posts)
17. 40 year loans were not widely embraced under Obama. And Obama himself clearly did not embrace them.
Tue Nov 11, 2025, 04:38 PM
Tuesday

The premise of this article is total BS. It was primarily a single Obama advisor advocating for 40 year mortgages. That person did not represent the Obama administration as a whole, and certainly did not represent he opinions of the Democratic Party as a whole.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/forget-30-mortgage-40-mortgage-164749315.html

Forget the 30-year mortgage: The 40-year mortgage needs to become the new American standard, former Obama advisor says
It’s no secret that people can’t afford to buy homes in this post-pandemic era. Home prices skyrocketed during the pandemic, mortgage rates soared after, and that brings us to the present moment: The storm has sort of calmed, and yet prices are still high, and so are rates. But the founder and chief executive of a nonprofit has an interesting proposal: a 40-year mortgage.

“The 30-year mortgage has been the American standard for decades, balancing affordable monthly payments with a reasonable repayment period,” Operation Hope’s John Hope Bryant wrote in an op-ed for CNBC. “However, as home prices soar and interest rates rise, particularly in urban areas, even 30-year mortgages can leave many families struggling with unaffordable payments.”

He continued: “A 40-year mortgage would lower monthly payments by extending the repayment period and possibly locking in an affordable market rate, making homeownership accessible to a broader segment of the population.”

Hope Bryant, a former advisor in the Obama administration, goes on to say the 30-year mortgage was a product of the Great Depression when people lived much shorter lives. “Today, with life expectancy nearing 80 years, a 40-year term aligns better with modern realities,” he wrote.


Random comments Found online:

40-year loans are a niche product used mainly for loan modifications and are not widely "embraced" by the mainstream mortgage market due to regulatory constraints and the long-term financial disadvantages for the borrower.

While 40 year mortgages do exist they are rarely used.

40 year mortgages have existed for many years. But they are non-QM, because one of the QM criteria is "term no greater than 30 years." That means that, as far as what the consumer sees, while the 40 year term makes the payment lower, the rates/fees/etc are all higher.

The Fed does not have unilateral authority to redefine QM. Congress would have to do it, via amending/repealing Dodd Frank and/or the Truth in Lending Act.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Who cares? n/t leftstreet Tuesday #1
Very simple BeerBarrelPolka Tuesday #2
50 year mortgages are like reverse mortgages. No one should use them unless absolutely necessary. But agree with post. Silent Type Tuesday #3
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Tuesday #4
Except sometimes folks have no choice. Silent Type Tuesday #5
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Tuesday #18
Yes,reverse M's tack on a lot of fees that eventually eat up all your equity, they are one of the worst bankster scams,. yaesu Tuesday #7
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Tuesday #11
Don't see any evidence majority of Dems embraced 40 yr mortgages uponit7771 Tuesday #15
I never embraced 40 year mortgages pat_k Tuesday #6
Is the mortgage schedule part and parcel of the Democratic platform? Torchlight Tuesday #8
10 year difference. We don't have adequate renovation programs. The homes are too BIG. bucolic_frolic Tuesday #9
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Tuesday #10
I'm mainly just complaining about the bullshit self-aggrandizement of putting Trump on a sign with FDR AZJonnie Tuesday #12
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Tuesday #13
Link to majority Dems embracing 40 yr mortgages under Obama ...tia uponit7771 Tuesday #14
We? demmiblue Tuesday #16
40 year loans were not widely embraced under Obama. And Obama himself clearly did not embrace them. Wiz Imp Tuesday #17
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Tuesday #24
40 year mortgages were one element of a package of comprehensive reforms DBoon Tuesday #26
Bullshit. Wiz Imp Tuesday #29
The way we do it is to propose a national credit union that will make SIMPLE INTEREST home loans Volaris Tuesday #19
40+ year mortgages are SMART in the right market conditions... WarGamer Tuesday #20
Which is why I find it disturbing that anyone on our side would be advocating against such options... PeaceWave Tuesday #21
Lower payments doesn't mean more affordable Happy Hoosier Wednesday #36
It's a quesiton of affordability. So either fix wages or fix real property prices. flvegan Tuesday #22
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Tuesday #23
I have no problem with 40 or 50 yr mortgages ... PBC_Democrat Tuesday #25
I hated the idea of a 40 yr mortgage then Sailingdiver Tuesday #27
Yes, a 50 year mortgage and the amount of interest paid over that period is insane. CentralMass Tuesday #28
You left out some critical facts: spooky3 Tuesday #30
I didn't know that I or we embraced 40 year loans Renew Deal Tuesday #31
The average voter doesn't know either newdeal2 Wednesday #35
But is there a universal problem or solution JT45242 Tuesday #32
THIS. You're actually providing one of the most substantive solutions to the current housing problem... PeaceWave Tuesday #34
Take a good look at the graph you reference in your OP. Totally Tunsie Tuesday #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»As a Party, how do we dis...»Reply #17