Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: As a Party, how do we distance ourselves from 50 year mortgages under Trump while we embraced 40 year loans under Obama? [View all]Wiz Imp
(8,140 posts)17. 40 year loans were not widely embraced under Obama. And Obama himself clearly did not embrace them.
The premise of this article is total BS. It was primarily a single Obama advisor advocating for 40 year mortgages. That person did not represent the Obama administration as a whole, and certainly did not represent he opinions of the Democratic Party as a whole.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/forget-30-mortgage-40-mortgage-164749315.html
Forget the 30-year mortgage: The 40-year mortgage needs to become the new American standard, former Obama advisor says
Its no secret that people cant afford to buy homes in this post-pandemic era. Home prices skyrocketed during the pandemic, mortgage rates soared after, and that brings us to the present moment: The storm has sort of calmed, and yet prices are still high, and so are rates. But the founder and chief executive of a nonprofit has an interesting proposal: a 40-year mortgage.
The 30-year mortgage has been the American standard for decades, balancing affordable monthly payments with a reasonable repayment period, Operation Hopes John Hope Bryant wrote in an op-ed for CNBC. However, as home prices soar and interest rates rise, particularly in urban areas, even 30-year mortgages can leave many families struggling with unaffordable payments.
He continued: A 40-year mortgage would lower monthly payments by extending the repayment period and possibly locking in an affordable market rate, making homeownership accessible to a broader segment of the population.
Hope Bryant, a former advisor in the Obama administration, goes on to say the 30-year mortgage was a product of the Great Depression when people lived much shorter lives. Today, with life expectancy nearing 80 years, a 40-year term aligns better with modern realities, he wrote.
Its no secret that people cant afford to buy homes in this post-pandemic era. Home prices skyrocketed during the pandemic, mortgage rates soared after, and that brings us to the present moment: The storm has sort of calmed, and yet prices are still high, and so are rates. But the founder and chief executive of a nonprofit has an interesting proposal: a 40-year mortgage.
The 30-year mortgage has been the American standard for decades, balancing affordable monthly payments with a reasonable repayment period, Operation Hopes John Hope Bryant wrote in an op-ed for CNBC. However, as home prices soar and interest rates rise, particularly in urban areas, even 30-year mortgages can leave many families struggling with unaffordable payments.
He continued: A 40-year mortgage would lower monthly payments by extending the repayment period and possibly locking in an affordable market rate, making homeownership accessible to a broader segment of the population.
Hope Bryant, a former advisor in the Obama administration, goes on to say the 30-year mortgage was a product of the Great Depression when people lived much shorter lives. Today, with life expectancy nearing 80 years, a 40-year term aligns better with modern realities, he wrote.
Random comments Found online:
40-year loans are a niche product used mainly for loan modifications and are not widely "embraced" by the mainstream mortgage market due to regulatory constraints and the long-term financial disadvantages for the borrower.
While 40 year mortgages do exist they are rarely used.
40 year mortgages have existed for many years. But they are non-QM, because one of the QM criteria is "term no greater than 30 years." That means that, as far as what the consumer sees, while the 40 year term makes the payment lower, the rates/fees/etc are all higher.
The Fed does not have unilateral authority to redefine QM. Congress would have to do it, via amending/repealing Dodd Frank and/or the Truth in Lending Act.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
As a Party, how do we distance ourselves from 50 year mortgages under Trump while we embraced 40 year loans under Obama? [View all]
PeaceWave
Tuesday
OP
50 year mortgages are like reverse mortgages. No one should use them unless absolutely necessary. But agree with post.
Silent Type
Tuesday
#3
Yes,reverse M's tack on a lot of fees that eventually eat up all your equity, they are one of the worst bankster scams,.
yaesu
Tuesday
#7
10 year difference. We don't have adequate renovation programs. The homes are too BIG.
bucolic_frolic
Tuesday
#9
I'm mainly just complaining about the bullshit self-aggrandizement of putting Trump on a sign with FDR
AZJonnie
Tuesday
#12
40 year loans were not widely embraced under Obama. And Obama himself clearly did not embrace them.
Wiz Imp
Tuesday
#17
The way we do it is to propose a national credit union that will make SIMPLE INTEREST home loans
Volaris
Tuesday
#19
Which is why I find it disturbing that anyone on our side would be advocating against such options...
PeaceWave
Tuesday
#21
It's a quesiton of affordability. So either fix wages or fix real property prices.
flvegan
Tuesday
#22
Yes, a 50 year mortgage and the amount of interest paid over that period is insane.
CentralMass
Tuesday
#28