Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(53,034 posts)
16. Manchin insisted on the 3 year sunsetting of the subsidies. It was one of his multiple demands in order to pass the 2022
Tue Nov 11, 2025, 05:48 PM
Tuesday

Inflation Reduction Act.


Inflation Reduction Act

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_Reduction_Act

snip

Legislative history

The Build Back Better Act, which passed the House on September 27, 2021, was used by the Senate as the legislative vehicle for this legislation. On August 6, 2022 Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer proposed an amendment which would replace the text of the previously passed bill with the text of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. This substitute amendment was later adopted.[34]

Schumer's lead staffer, Gerry Petrella, recalled the surprise phone call came from Senator Joe Manchin's office just prior to the August recess and the breakthrough negotiations occurred on the final summer weekend.[35] Some of the many experts, lobbyists and organizers who worked to refine the bill's provisions included Leah C. Stokes, Adrian Deveny, Katherine Hamilton, Ari Appel, Mike Carr, Danielle Deiseroth, Ari Mathusiak, Camila Thorndike, Jamal Raad, Topher Spiro, and Yogin Kothari;[36][21][37] the overall approach was shaped by Manchin and Senators Ron Wyden, Mark Warner and Chris Coons, while Representative Scott Peters worked to add pro-pharmaceutical industry limits to the Medicare drug pricing provisions, Bernie Sanders contributed the basis for the Solar for All program, and Senators Elizabeth Warren and Kyrsten Sinema negotiated on shaping an alternative minimum tax for corporate book income.[21][38][22]

On August 7, 2022, following the vote-a-rama, an unlimited marathon voting session on amendments, that lasted nearly 16 hours, the Senate passed the bill (as amended) on a 51–50 vote, with all Democrats voting in favor, all Republicans voting against, and Vice President Kamala Harris breaking the tie.[3] On August 12, 2022, the bill was passed by the House on a 220–207 vote, with all Democrats voting in favor and all Republicans voting against it.[4] On August 16, 2022, the bill was signed into law by President Joe Biden.[39]

Provisions

Over a period of 10 years, the law was estimated to raise revenue from:[40][41][42]

Prescription drug price reform to lower prices, including Medicare negotiation of drug prices for certain drugs (starting at 10 new ones per year by 2026, increasing to more than 20 additional ones per year[43] by 2029)[44][45] and rebates from drug makers who price gouge – $281 billion[7][44][45]
Imposing a selective 15% corporate minimum tax rate for companies with higher than $1 billion of annual financial statement income – $222 billion
Increased tax enforcement – $181 billion[7][46]
Imposing a 1% excise tax on stock buybacks – $74 billion
2-year extension of the limitation on excess business losses – $53 billion[7]

In the same time period, it would spend this revenue on:[40][47]

Addressing domestic energy security and climate change, including funding for drought resiliency in western states – $783 billion[7]
Continuing for three more years the expansion of Affordable Care Act subsidies originally expanded under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 – $64 billion
Changes to Medicare Part D, low-income subsidies, vaccine coverage, and insulin – $44 billion[7]
Increased funding for the IRS for modernization and increased tax enforcement, including the hiring of up to 87,000 new IRS employees – $80 billion[46][48]

$663 billion of the law's climate action investments are embedded in the federal tax code.[49] Of these, McKinsey & Company estimates that roughly half the tax savings will go to corporations.[50] As part of the overall investment into clean energy, the law created a green bank,[51][52][53] extended the solar investment tax credit for 10 years[54] and invested $30 billion in nuclear power (including $700 million for high-assay low enrichment uranium (HALEU) fuel source research and development and $150 million for new Office of Nuclear Energy research)[55] and $760 million in facilitating electric power transmission siting reform.[56] It also invests $12 billion in electric vehicle incentives, $14 billion in home energy efficiency upgrades, $22 billion in home energy supply improvements, and $37 billion in advanced manufacturing.[57][40] (The latter amount includes $5.46 billion for a DOE program for zero-emissions industrial tech demonstrations,[58][59] $10 billion for the renewed 48C tax credit,[60] and more than $5 billion to the USDOT and GSA to lower embedded emissions in procurement.[61]) $19.5 billion goes to investments in climate-smart agriculture, more than $5 billion goes to revising remediation programs for those affected by discriminatory USDA lending practices, $5 billion goes to forest protection and urban heat island reductions, and nearly $3 billion goes to coastal habitat protection.[62][63][64] Lastly, the Act gives $1.005 billion to various agencies to increase staffing levels and kickstart permitting reform, particularly of environmental reviews.[56]

Alternatively, the Act's climate investments can be summarized as follows: $196–372 billion in energy, $67–183 billion in manufacturing, $28–48 billion in building retrofits and energy efficiency, $23–436 billion in transportation, $22–26 billion in environmental justice, land use, air pollution reduction and/or resilience, and $3–21 billion in agriculture.[65][66][67][68][69][70]

However, the law also requires that for federal lands, oil and gas auctions take place before wind and solar leasing, even as it provides for the Interior Department to raise royalty rates on oil and gas projects from 12.5% to 16.7%.[71][72]

The law contained provisions that cap insulin costs at $35/month and will cap out-of-pocket drug costs at $2,000 for people on Medicare, among other provisions.[40][44][45] The law also extended Affordable Care Act health insurance exchange subsidies, preventing people making above four times the poverty line from ineligibility for the exchanges.

Several provisions in the initial deal between Schumer and Manchin were changed after negotiations with Senator Sinema: a provision narrowing the carried interest loophole was dropped, a 1% excise tax on stock buybacks was added, manufacturing exceptions were added to the corporate minimum tax (itself having been crafted by Elizabeth Warren and refined by Lawrence Summers and Natasha Sarin),[73][74] and funding for drought relief for western states was added.[75][76][77]

snip


Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why didn't they push that expiration date? leftstreet Tuesday #1
Mostly due to the funny math that is required under reconciliation. tritsofme Tuesday #4
Don't scold voters over arcane senate rules leftstreet Tuesday #11
this is arguing with umbrellas bigtree Tuesday #14
We could also try not attacking Democrats out of ignorance. tritsofme Tuesday #15
LOL leftstreet Tuesday #18
I posted the reason. Manchin, bigtree Tuesday #5
Schumer couldn't control Manchin? leftstreet Tuesday #9
take some time to read the history of that legislative period bigtree Tuesday #12
Okay n/t leftstreet Tuesday #13
Pure silliness. You can't "strip committee assignments" from members who can strip the majority away from you. tritsofme Tuesday #19
You think they'd give up their power? leftstreet Tuesday #22
It would have been a completely empty threat, when they could react to any such tritsofme Tuesday #29
So rigged leftstreet Tuesday #30
That's just the reality. tritsofme Tuesday #33
My guess is that either Manchin refused to go any longer dsc Tuesday #6
It's sad they didn't use another mechanism leftstreet Tuesday #21
Manchin insisted on the 3 year sunsetting of the subsidies. It was one of his multiple demands in order to pass the 2022 Celerity Tuesday #16
I know leftstreet Tuesday #24
Hope this helps orangecrush Tuesday #2
Schumer will remain the minority leader until we win the House in '26. It is up to the voters whether we walkingman Tuesday #3
in my view bigtree Tuesday #8
If AOC primaries him then I think he retires. Ace Rothstein Tuesday #32
Who would replace him, any ideas? We have to come up with a real solution to the Progressive/Moderate walkingman Tuesday #34
it's going to be a free for all bigtree Tuesday #37
Merci! Mme. Defarge Tuesday #7
Can you post a thread without criticizing your fellow DUers? demmiblue Tuesday #10
Zero chance of that. We all just need to conform harder and be more servile to leadership. BannonsLiver Tuesday #45
Yes, he was heading cat as well. frogstar0 Tuesday #17
Two things Samael13 Tuesday #20
he fucking controlled these senators for 40 damn days bigtree Tuesday #23
Good for him Samael13 Tuesday #25
that's not accurate. Not by a mile. bigtree Tuesday #26
Dear bigtree -,people just don't want to take the time to Ninga Tuesday #38
Excellent point ..... anciano Tuesday #35
no one lost their job bigtree Tuesday #40
Aha..I should have said "laid off" instead of "lost"..... anciano Tuesday #42
That sounds like how abusive/neglectful parents talk about kids to excuse their own behavior. RockRaven Tuesday #27
I'm not responsible for how you process facts. bigtree Tuesday #28
By all means, continue communicating with others as you have been with the same results then. RockRaven Tuesday #31
oh my bigtree Tuesday #36
Thumbs up or thumbs down is the most basic political action we can take Ilikepurple Tuesday #39
whatever, I'm not campaigning for anything bigtree Tuesday #41
I'm at a loss as to what this thread's purpose is then? Ilikepurple Tuesday #43
Amen! Preach on.... anciano Tuesday #48
how the heck am I supposed to know what you want? bigtree Tuesday #49
Spin it! BannonsLiver Tuesday #44
🎼🎵🎶🔊 Celerity Tuesday #46
Total banger even after all these years. BannonsLiver Tuesday #47
Whatever Schumer's done and been in the past, he isn't up to the task now Arazi Tuesday #50
Does this mean we owe Schumer two thank-yous? One for his assistance is giving us the ACA and one for taking it from us? in2herbs Wednesday #51
Great post. 👍 underpants Wednesday #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ACA credits people are ac...»Reply #16