Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Who cares? n/t leftstreet Tuesday #1
Very simple BeerBarrelPolka Tuesday #2
50 year mortgages are like reverse mortgages. No one should use them unless absolutely necessary. But agree with post. Silent Type Tuesday #3
No. A reverse mortgage depletes equity. A 50 year loan does not do so... PeaceWave Tuesday #4
Except sometimes folks have no choice. Silent Type Tuesday #5
An actual reverse mortgage is the worst of all possible choices... PeaceWave Tuesday #18
Yes,reverse M's tack on a lot of fees that eventually eat up all your equity, they are one of the worst bankster scams,. yaesu Tuesday #7
Agreed. From my perspective, reverse mortgages should be illegal. PeaceWave Tuesday #11
Don't see any evidence majority of Dems embraced 40 yr mortgages uponit7771 Tuesday #15
I never embraced 40 year mortgages pat_k Tuesday #6
Is the mortgage schedule part and parcel of the Democratic platform? Torchlight Tuesday #8
10 year difference. We don't have adequate renovation programs. The homes are too BIG. bucolic_frolic Tuesday #9
I can't speak for other states, but California has streamlined Alternative Dwelling Unit laws... PeaceWave Tuesday #10
I'm mainly just complaining about the bullshit self-aggrandizement of putting Trump on a sign with FDR AZJonnie Tuesday #12
These are all valid concerns. PeaceWave Tuesday #13
Link to majority Dems embracing 40 yr mortgages under Obama ...tia uponit7771 Tuesday #14
We? demmiblue Tuesday #16
40 year loans were not widely embraced under Obama. And Obama himself clearly did not embrace them. Wiz Imp Tuesday #17
Obama not only embraced 40 year loans, but HAMP loans were also nicknamed "Obama Loans" PeaceWave Tuesday #24
40 year mortgages were one element of a package of comprehensive reforms DBoon Tuesday #26
Bullshit. Wiz Imp Tuesday #29
The way we do it is to propose a national credit union that will make SIMPLE INTEREST home loans Volaris Tuesday #19
40+ year mortgages are SMART in the right market conditions... WarGamer Tuesday #20
Which is why I find it disturbing that anyone on our side would be advocating against such options... PeaceWave Tuesday #21
Lower payments doesn't mean more affordable Happy Hoosier Yesterday #36
It's a quesiton of affordability. So either fix wages or fix real property prices. flvegan Tuesday #22
Fine. But, neither wages nor real property prices are anything that banks can fix... PeaceWave Tuesday #23
I have no problem with 40 or 50 yr mortgages ... PBC_Democrat Tuesday #25
I hated the idea of a 40 yr mortgage then Sailingdiver Tuesday #27
Yes, a 50 year mortgage and the amount of interest paid over that period is insane. CentralMass Tuesday #28
You left out some critical facts: spooky3 Tuesday #30
I didn't know that I or we embraced 40 year loans Renew Deal Tuesday #31
The average voter doesn't know either newdeal2 Yesterday #35
But is there a universal problem or solution JT45242 Tuesday #32
THIS. You're actually providing one of the most substantive solutions to the current housing problem... PeaceWave Tuesday #34
Take a good look at the graph you reference in your OP. Totally Tunsie Tuesday #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»As a Party, how do we dis...»Reply #31