Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So as I wake this morning and what no vote, no food stamps... [View all]onenote
(45,841 posts)82. It's hardly "splitting hairs"
You wrote that "today the threat is there will be no vote on [ the bill to end the shutdown ] it in the house without removing any abortion provisions in the ACA." That simply is untrue. And while folks cant disagree about the deal to end the shutdown, that doesn't give anyone leeway to make up their own facts.
And you are right, there were no food stamps today. Would there have been food stamps today without the deal? What about tomorrow, a week from now, a month from now? How much pain were you willing to inflict on the 42 million Americans who rely on SNAP? As much as the repubs?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Indivisible primary campaign to replace cowardice with backbone. With excerpt below.
usonian
19 hrs ago
#15
So, women will be expected to pay the "price" for continued ACA subsidies for all?
Diamond_Dog
18 hrs ago
#26
To think Susan Sarandon's comments are now the Senate Minority Leader's view
Sympthsical
16 hrs ago
#59
Can I take you up on your bet about Trump keeping the SNAP crisis and not paying?
onenote
14 hrs ago
#86
10 more days and the Airlines would have stormed the GOP caucus leaders on the Hill
Attilatheblond
18 hrs ago
#40
Thats exactly the reason. Thune (and some House republicans) would have taken the ACA funding AS A MERCY.
Volaris
11 hrs ago
#93
I imagine setting up the board would be easy but I've yet to see any one win it.
Autumn
18 hrs ago
#24
Yeah, I'm no politician but I would think that would be engraved in stone somewhere.
Autumn
18 hrs ago
#27
Hell, after supreme courts continued stalling, it wouldn't surprise me if
bluestarone
18 hrs ago
#28
Whatever Schumer is/is not doing behind the scenes, his communication failures compel removal
Arazi
16 hrs ago
#57
I heard on TV that the Supreme Court has temporarily blocked the administration
Autumn
17 hrs ago
#44
Well excuse the hell out of me But please split hairs. Again. What do you think Tillis, Schumer and his masterful
Autumn
15 hrs ago
#80
That still isn't an excuse for posting misinformation, intentionally or otherwise.
onenote
12 hrs ago
#89
If its all over social media, and I haven't seen it, its a bunch of know nothings spreading misinformation
onenote
11 hrs ago
#92
Well, they aren't getting any of that today, and Democrats already caved.
hamsterjill
14 hrs ago
#84
Because the Democrats shouldn't have started it if they weren't going to finish it.
hamsterjill
11 hrs ago
#95
So you see no benefit from forcing the repubs to oppose extension of the ACA enhanced benefits.
onenote
11 hrs ago
#97
Yesterday Rick Wilson said from his experience he knew that Democrats are gullible. Ya think?
flashman13
18 hrs ago
#43
No they are not gullible. There's a difference between gullible and complicit.
Autumn
17 hrs ago
#45