Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

slightlv

(7,029 posts)
31. I don't quite know what to make of the section
Wed Nov 12, 2025, 05:48 PM
11 hrs ago

in Permitted Withholdings...

(B) depict or contain child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) as defined under 18 U.S.C. 2256 and prohibited under 18 U.S.C. 2252–2252A;


So, because it would be obscenity under the U.S. laws, they're permitted to withhold the materials? Isn't the point of this to root out the corruption and obscenity, obtain justice for those so used, and (wishfully) adjudicate, judge, and march to prison those, like trump, who took part in these horrible crimes?

I don't know what material is available in these situations... but I kind of see this akin to refusing to show the horror of mass school shootings. If people could see the aftermath, we might actually get legal changes. While it's all just words and thoughts in the mind, we sit in a shooting gallery.

I just don't want to see what these people (girls, young women, and boys) be hidden behind legalities like gun crimes. It seems we "forgive" the worst of the worst, while locking up law-abiding citizens who may have missed a court date, etc...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R UTUSN 13 hrs ago #1
Are they negotiating for a bigger bribe? Irish_Dem 13 hrs ago #2
Its probably because they realize that there is likely no way the files will be released anyway. n/t demmiblue 13 hrs ago #6
Or the files have all been re-written to make Trump look like Mother Theresa. Irish_Dem 13 hrs ago #8
I would love to see an AI picture of that... ananda 11 hrs ago #32
Or how about this? PJMcK 13 hrs ago #11
Additionally, Mace has built her entire public persona Bettie 13 hrs ago #12
I keep posting this reminder GusBob 13 hrs ago #14
Yes, they're horrible people uponit7771 12 hrs ago #20
Good Lord. Principles? Now? nolabear 13 hrs ago #3
More to do with the prospect of Boebert losing her house seat. BannonsLiver 7 hrs ago #45
Thanks, blue! Leghorn21 13 hrs ago #4
25 Minutes BeerBarrelPolka 13 hrs ago #5
As long as Mr trump keeps throwing fits over this and keeps it in the news Torchlight 13 hrs ago #7
Well, you were wrong, MarineCombatEngineer 12 hrs ago #23
I would imagine that Massie is testing a few other Republicans to sign on karynnj 13 hrs ago #9
There are reports that as many as 100 Republicans (or more!) could vote YES Wiz Imp 13 hrs ago #15
It isnt legislation, right? SSJVegeta 12 hrs ago #18
Nope. It IS legislation. Wiz Imp 12 hrs ago #22
I think thats different from what the discharge petition is doing. SSJVegeta 9 hrs ago #37
You're wrong. I don't know why you insist on arguing this. Wiz Imp 8 hrs ago #39
Truth is it doesnt matter if itbis or isnt legislation SSJVegeta 8 hrs ago #38
There is no indication that the House will do a full investigation of this. Wiz Imp 8 hrs ago #40
This message was self-deleted by its author SSJVegeta 8 hrs ago #41
OK. This explains why those files got released today. They came from the Epstein estate, NOT the DOJ Wiz Imp 8 hrs ago #42
West Wing ketchup bottles are considering throwing themselves against a wall to beat the rush. 11 Bravo 13 hrs ago #10
They know that the orange turd is becoming weaker and is losing support among magaloons also kimbutgar 13 hrs ago #13
Rat's abandoning a sinking ship... sop 12 hrs ago #16
I like this one from Family Guy also: MarineCombatEngineer 12 hrs ago #21
Can't believe I'm saying this, but GOOD ON Lauren Boebert and Nancy Mace! Fil1957 12 hrs ago #17
Trump tells Mikey to expel Mace, MTG or Boebert for mental instability and moral turpitude. Marcuse 12 hrs ago #19
They can't after it reaches 218 votes, which it just did, according to MeidasTouch. highplainsdem 12 hrs ago #24
Soooooo. .tomorrow? niyad 11 hrs ago #25
LOL. MarineCombatEngineer 11 hrs ago #26
I predict Mikey will announce the vote for the 2nd Tues. of the 13th month. nt MarineCombatEngineer 11 hrs ago #27
They will eventually cave angrychair 11 hrs ago #28
It could also be that they are a whole lot younger than the orange turdblossom... llmart 11 hrs ago #29
Crum has outlived his usefullness to them bucolic_frolic 11 hrs ago #30
I don't quite know what to make of the section slightlv 11 hrs ago #31
Today. Scrivener7 11 hrs ago #33
du rec. AllaN01Bear 11 hrs ago #34
As noted, once 218 signatures are achieved, the list is "frozen." But the vote isn't immediate. Here the process: onenote 11 hrs ago #35
According to Politico, the vote is expected to take pllace the first week of December Wiz Imp 7 hrs ago #43
Sounds right, but now its being reported that Johnson wants to accelerate the process. onenote 7 hrs ago #44
We only wish that someone popsdenver 10 hrs ago #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Boebert and Mace claim th...»Reply #31