Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

videohead5

(2,797 posts)

2. If they have then

Reply to BlueTsunami2018 (Reply #1)

Wed Nov 12, 2025, 06:11 PM

Wednesday

Why are they still trying to stop the Epstein documents from coming out? No, I don't believe that they have, but they could. Those photos are the smoking gun. It would not surprise me if they announced that some of the files are missing.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

sheshe2

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Democrats better start warning Bondi [View all] videohead5 Wednesday OP

They almost certainly already have. BlueTsunami2018 Wednesday #1

If they have then videohead5 Wednesday #2

IF is the word. IF they destroyed the Epstein files... They are trying to hide that they destroyed them. ancianita Wednesday #6

The List! She had the List sitting on her desk. thought crime Wednesday #11

Or what edhopper Wednesday #3

The Democrats will be videohead5 Wednesday #5

We hope edhopper Wednesday #9

I find this to be a pretty silly argument. Wiz Imp Wednesday #4

Don't you see? You say... ancianita Wednesday #7

But if they were concerned about breaking that law, they wouldn't do it. Wiz Imp Wednesday #8

If there weren't still "receipts", they wouldn't be working so hard to prevent the discharge petition. yellow dahlia Wednesday #10