Sorry to annoy everyone yet again, but much about that Epstein email hangs on the accuracy of one word [View all]

That word is "Victim". As such, I think there's more that we need the answer to before we pop the champagne corks saying yelling we were right all along.

Consider the exact content as presented to us, but two different versions of it, and keep in mind we don't really know any other context (which, to me, is odd, as this seems to be the middle of a discussion):

or this version



Wherein "Donna Smith" is actually a cop, but the person who redacted it, just assumed "Victim".

I would propose to everyone here to at least *consider* the possibility that (Victim) turns out to be inaccurate. Why? Because the 2nd version of this email makes at LEAST as much sense, if not more. In this version, he's simply saying Trump hasn't ratted him out, as far as he knows. And "75% there" in this context is some kind of gauge on how close he is to getting out of deep shit with investigators.

Without knowing what was actually there, OR the surrounding context, I'm hesitant throw 100% credence on use of the word "Victim". I know this is annoying habit of mine, I'm sorry I'm always doing this and people are just going ugh But I also have a hard time thinking that if " (Name of Victim) " was the original words, and Biden's DoJ didn't find a way to get this content out there via a leak, or something, before the 2024 election? I'd just be really severely disappointed

OTOH, at minimum, in version #2? It's SOLID PROOF that not only did Trump KNOW? But he was also literally talked to by the cops, and (apparently) didn't say shit about what he KNEW!!! As I've consistently said, there's no question he fucking KNEW and didn't SAY shit, and the files are full of that, which really may be enough for him to fight their release as he has

Again sorry to piss in the proverbial cheerios, yet again.