General Discussion

AZJonnie

(2,249 posts)

7. Well, that's very convenient since Giuffre REPEATEDLY exonerated Trump of any wrongdoing including in her book

Wed Nov 12, 2025, 07:05 PM

10 hrs ago

However, this email is from 2011. Virginia Guiffre left Epstein's orbit in ... checks notes ... 2002.

So, Trump wants us to believe that NINE YEARS later, Epstein is just randomly bringing up the time when Guiffre met Trump? His victim who said "he couldn't have been nicer" about Donald Trump?

WHY? That makes absolutely zero sense.

However, it WOULD make a lot of sense to NOT want to say "that was actually a COP", would it not?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

JBTaurus83 FakeNoose

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sorry to annoy everyone yet again, but much about that Epstein email hangs on the accuracy of one word [View all] AZJonnie 10 hrs ago OP

you seem very vested in all of this Skittles 10 hrs ago #1

to be honest every day I see dozens here incredibly vested in this. WarGamer 10 hrs ago #3

I have two answers for you AZJonnie 10 hrs ago #4

Is that email in question from the estate? OneGrassRoot 10 hrs ago #6

I cannot possibly imagine that the DoJ does/did not have everything the Estate has in this regard, long ago AZJonnie 10 hrs ago #8

Well, not just Biden's DOJ. Sorry to burst the bubble you'd prefer to exist in, but it is true. RockRaven 10 hrs ago #10

I see you as rather a brilliant person so this reply surprises me. AZJonnie 9 hrs ago #11

I believe my last post failed to communicate to you what I intended. RockRaven 9 hrs ago #18

Thanks for clarification. This is exactly the sort of cogent argument I always see from RockRaven AZJonnie 1 hr ago #33

I don't think BeerBarrelPolka 1 hr ago #34

yeah OK Skittles 9 hrs ago #12

Because Biden wanted to protect others. Sadly. Bluesaph 2 hrs ago #32

I am one KentuckyWoman 9 hrs ago #19

The White House released the name Abnredleg 10 hrs ago #2

Well, that's very convenient since Giuffre REPEATEDLY exonerated Trump of any wrongdoing including in her book AZJonnie 10 hrs ago #7

do you admit that Trump is one vile, disgusting POS??? Skittles 9 hrs ago #13

Do you not see what I post, all day and every day? I mean obviously not everything, but generally? AZJonnie 9 hrs ago #15

The premise of this post is wrong, from what I've read. The ID is known, from multiple RockRaven 10 hrs ago #5

See my post #7 above this one. AZJonnie 10 hrs ago #9

and how do you know she wasn't under duress? Skittles 9 hrs ago #14

Because it was in her 2025 memoir that she just wrote, and her estate released posthumously AZJonnie 9 hrs ago #17

speak for yourself Skittles 9 hrs ago #21

We are making the same point. Yes, she is gone, having exonerated him (to her knowledge) on her way out. AZJonnie 8 hrs ago #23

It doesn't matter Boo1 9 hrs ago #16

I want to address this part of your post Quiet Em 9 hrs ago #20

I get what you mean, but I was asked why *I* am so interested in the case near the top of the thread. AZJonnie 8 hrs ago #24

You are not annoying me and no apology is required. Disaffected 8 hrs ago #22

From what I've read, the "VICTIM" redaction was in the version of the files supplied by the estate, Emrys 8 hrs ago #25

Not suggesting anyone tried to warp the facts, but mistakes can be made on a task like that AZJonnie 7 hrs ago #26

It MIGHT be an inside joke, but to borrow the words of a past US president, "I want to hear him deny it." Emrys 6 hrs ago #28

I've said this like 20 times in various posts over months but not everyone see everything, so again lol AZJonnie 4 hrs ago #29

"the 'complete release of DoJ files' for any case is not a normal occurrence" Emrys 4 hrs ago #30

Setting aside the details of our particular definitions of "great lengths", the point is we agree AZJonnie 3 hrs ago #31

AZJohnny I agree with you that it wasn't Virginia Roberts Giuffre that Chump met at Epstein's house FakeNoose 6 hrs ago #27