Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ancianita

(42,577 posts)

7. Don't you see? You say...

Reply to Wiz Imp (Reply #4)

Wed Nov 12, 2025, 07:11 PM

Wednesday

And if the answer is, they have done it already, then there is no reason to object to their release.

then you also have to say that destroying court evidence is a federal offense. Then the question is: what happens to AG Pam Bondi.

Destruction of court files or evidence is a federal offense, which can lead to fines, imprisonment, and even forfeiture of office. Federal laws, such as 18 U.S.C. § 1519, make it a crime to knowingly alter, destroy, or conceal records with the intent to impede a federal investigation or case. Other laws, like 18 U.S.C. § 2071, specifically target custodians of public records who do so.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Democrats better start warning Bondi [View all] videohead5 Wednesday OP

They almost certainly already have. BlueTsunami2018 Wednesday #1

If they have then videohead5 Wednesday #2

IF is the word. IF they destroyed the Epstein files... They are trying to hide that they destroyed them. ancianita Wednesday #6

The List! She had the List sitting on her desk. thought crime Wednesday #11

Or what edhopper Wednesday #3

The Democrats will be videohead5 Wednesday #5

We hope edhopper Wednesday #9

I find this to be a pretty silly argument. Wiz Imp Wednesday #4

Don't you see? You say... ancianita Wednesday #7

But if they were concerned about breaking that law, they wouldn't do it. Wiz Imp Wednesday #8

If there weren't still "receipts", they wouldn't be working so hard to prevent the discharge petition. yellow dahlia Wednesday #10

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrats better start wa...»Reply #7