Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

you seem very vested in all of this Skittles Wednesday #1
to be honest every day I see dozens here incredibly vested in this. WarGamer Wednesday #3
I have two answers for you AZJonnie Wednesday #4
Is that email in question from the estate? OneGrassRoot Wednesday #6
I cannot possibly imagine that the DoJ does/did not have everything the Estate has in this regard, long ago AZJonnie Wednesday #8
Well, not just Biden's DOJ. Sorry to burst the bubble you'd prefer to exist in, but it is true. RockRaven Wednesday #10
I see you as rather a brilliant person so this reply surprises me. AZJonnie Wednesday #11
I believe my last post failed to communicate to you what I intended. RockRaven Wednesday #18
Thanks for clarification. This is exactly the sort of cogent argument I always see from RockRaven AZJonnie Yesterday #33
I don't think BeerBarrelPolka Yesterday #34
yeah OK Skittles Wednesday #12
Because Biden wanted to protect others. Sadly. Bluesaph Yesterday #32
I am one KentuckyWoman Wednesday #19
The White House released the name Abnredleg Wednesday #2
Well, that's very convenient since Giuffre REPEATEDLY exonerated Trump of any wrongdoing including in her book AZJonnie Wednesday #7
do you admit that Trump is one vile, disgusting POS??? Skittles Wednesday #13
Do you not see what I post, all day and every day? I mean obviously not everything, but generally? AZJonnie Wednesday #15
The premise of this post is wrong, from what I've read. The ID is known, from multiple RockRaven Wednesday #5
See my post #7 above this one. AZJonnie Wednesday #9
and how do you know she wasn't under duress? Skittles Wednesday #14
Because it was in her 2025 memoir that she just wrote, and her estate released posthumously AZJonnie Wednesday #17
speak for yourself Skittles Wednesday #21
We are making the same point. Yes, she is gone, having exonerated him (to her knowledge) on her way out. AZJonnie Wednesday #23
It doesn't matter Boo1 Wednesday #16
I want to address this part of your post Quiet Em Wednesday #20
I get what you mean, but I was asked why *I* am so interested in the case near the top of the thread. AZJonnie Wednesday #24
You are not annoying me and no apology is required. Disaffected Wednesday #22
From what I've read, the "VICTIM" redaction was in the version of the files supplied by the estate, Emrys Wednesday #25
Not suggesting anyone tried to warp the facts, but mistakes can be made on a task like that AZJonnie Wednesday #26
It MIGHT be an inside joke, but to borrow the words of a past US president, "I want to hear him deny it." Emrys Wednesday #28
I've said this like 20 times in various posts over months but not everyone see everything, so again lol AZJonnie Yesterday #29
"the 'complete release of DoJ files' for any case is not a normal occurrence" Emrys Yesterday #30
Setting aside the details of our particular definitions of "great lengths", the point is we agree AZJonnie Yesterday #31
AZJohnny I agree with you that it wasn't Virginia Roberts Giuffre that Chump met at Epstein's house FakeNoose Wednesday #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sorry to annoy everyone y...»Reply #13