General Discussion

AZJonnie

(2,250 posts)

15. Do you not see what I post, all day and every day? I mean obviously not everything, but generally?

Wed Nov 12, 2025, 07:44 PM

15 hrs ago

I blast that motherfucker, and the GQP, all day, every day. Of COURSE I think he's vile disgusting POS. I'm POSITIVE that Trump absolutely knew what Epstein was doing, and didn't do shit. In fact, as I've often said, I think the vile POS tried to blackmail Epstein, and that is what the birthday card actually was, because Epstein knew Trump was laundering Russian money through his FL properties, and Trump knew what Epstein was up to. So the message was "you keep my secrets, I'll keep yours". Which is extremely vile. I'm just a lot LESS sure he was banging Epstein's victims, part of his "ring", etc. The evidence remains weak. I'm sorry, I call it as I see it

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

FakeNoose

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sorry to annoy everyone yet again, but much about that Epstein email hangs on the accuracy of one word [View all] AZJonnie 16 hrs ago OP

you seem very vested in all of this Skittles 16 hrs ago #1

to be honest every day I see dozens here incredibly vested in this. WarGamer 16 hrs ago #3

I have two answers for you AZJonnie 16 hrs ago #4

Is that email in question from the estate? OneGrassRoot 16 hrs ago #6

I cannot possibly imagine that the DoJ does/did not have everything the Estate has in this regard, long ago AZJonnie 15 hrs ago #8

Well, not just Biden's DOJ. Sorry to burst the bubble you'd prefer to exist in, but it is true. RockRaven 15 hrs ago #10

I see you as rather a brilliant person so this reply surprises me. AZJonnie 15 hrs ago #11

I believe my last post failed to communicate to you what I intended. RockRaven 14 hrs ago #18

Thanks for clarification. This is exactly the sort of cogent argument I always see from RockRaven AZJonnie 7 hrs ago #33

I don't think BeerBarrelPolka 6 hrs ago #34

yeah OK Skittles 15 hrs ago #12

Because Biden wanted to protect others. Sadly. Bluesaph 7 hrs ago #32

I am one KentuckyWoman 14 hrs ago #19

The White House released the name Abnredleg 16 hrs ago #2

Well, that's very convenient since Giuffre REPEATEDLY exonerated Trump of any wrongdoing including in her book AZJonnie 15 hrs ago #7

do you admit that Trump is one vile, disgusting POS??? Skittles 15 hrs ago #13

Do you not see what I post, all day and every day? I mean obviously not everything, but generally? AZJonnie 15 hrs ago #15

The premise of this post is wrong, from what I've read. The ID is known, from multiple RockRaven 16 hrs ago #5

See my post #7 above this one. AZJonnie 15 hrs ago #9

and how do you know she wasn't under duress? Skittles 15 hrs ago #14

Because it was in her 2025 memoir that she just wrote, and her estate released posthumously AZJonnie 15 hrs ago #17

speak for yourself Skittles 14 hrs ago #21

We are making the same point. Yes, she is gone, having exonerated him (to her knowledge) on her way out. AZJonnie 14 hrs ago #23

It doesn't matter Boo1 15 hrs ago #16

I want to address this part of your post Quiet Em 14 hrs ago #20

I get what you mean, but I was asked why *I* am so interested in the case near the top of the thread. AZJonnie 13 hrs ago #24

You are not annoying me and no apology is required. Disaffected 14 hrs ago #22

From what I've read, the "VICTIM" redaction was in the version of the files supplied by the estate, Emrys 13 hrs ago #25

Not suggesting anyone tried to warp the facts, but mistakes can be made on a task like that AZJonnie 12 hrs ago #26

It MIGHT be an inside joke, but to borrow the words of a past US president, "I want to hear him deny it." Emrys 11 hrs ago #28

I've said this like 20 times in various posts over months but not everyone see everything, so again lol AZJonnie 10 hrs ago #29

"the 'complete release of DoJ files' for any case is not a normal occurrence" Emrys 9 hrs ago #30

Setting aside the details of our particular definitions of "great lengths", the point is we agree AZJonnie 9 hrs ago #31

AZJohnny I agree with you that it wasn't Virginia Roberts Giuffre that Chump met at Epstein's house FakeNoose 12 hrs ago #27