General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sorry to annoy everyone yet again, but much about that Epstein email hangs on the accuracy of one word [View all]AZJonnie
(2,291 posts)What I said was a 100% honest assessment of how I would feel about it if the files are full of stuff that could nail Trump to the cross, get him impeached (and certainly could have kept him from being elected), and it was ignored for 4 years. I give the Biden DOJ the benefit of the doubt, because I don't think they WOULD have done that. This is probably why I am always proposing alternate ways of looking at things, because I will honestly be very disillusioned if there is ironclad shit in those files against Trump proving he was trafficking children. Since I am always thinking through that lens, my assessments often fly in the face of, shall we say, DU conventional thinking?
" If the con artist had nothing to hide, why put so much effort into quashing it? "
Well, this post speaks to that. If (Victim) is actually (Cop), it proves almost without question that not only did Trump take it on himself to say nothing, he actually, ACTIVELY covered for Epstein with the cops. Not exposing that, I could probably forgive the Biden DOJ for, because it's not raping kids.
At the same time, proof he did that WOULD rise to the level of something Trump would try HARD to quash, don't you think?