General Discussion

Emrys

(8,750 posts)

25. From what I've read, the "VICTIM" redaction was in the version of the files supplied by the estate,

Wed Nov 12, 2025, 09:18 PM

Yesterday

and whoever did that redacting on behalf of the estate must have done so knowing the identity, so your argument doesn't hold water unless you're suggesting that someone acting on behalf of the estate is seeking to warp the facts.

Meanwhile, it looks like Trump's got some more 'splaining to do:

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

BeerBarrelPolka

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sorry to annoy everyone yet again, but much about that Epstein email hangs on the accuracy of one word [View all] AZJonnie Yesterday OP

you seem very vested in all of this Skittles Yesterday #1

to be honest every day I see dozens here incredibly vested in this. WarGamer Yesterday #3

I have two answers for you AZJonnie Yesterday #4

Is that email in question from the estate? OneGrassRoot Yesterday #6

I cannot possibly imagine that the DoJ does/did not have everything the Estate has in this regard, long ago AZJonnie Yesterday #8

Well, not just Biden's DOJ. Sorry to burst the bubble you'd prefer to exist in, but it is true. RockRaven Yesterday #10

I see you as rather a brilliant person so this reply surprises me. AZJonnie Yesterday #11

I believe my last post failed to communicate to you what I intended. RockRaven Yesterday #18

Thanks for clarification. This is exactly the sort of cogent argument I always see from RockRaven AZJonnie 18 hrs ago #33

I don't think BeerBarrelPolka 18 hrs ago #34

yeah OK Skittles Yesterday #12

Because Biden wanted to protect others. Sadly. Bluesaph 19 hrs ago #32

I am one KentuckyWoman Yesterday #19

The White House released the name Abnredleg Yesterday #2

Well, that's very convenient since Giuffre REPEATEDLY exonerated Trump of any wrongdoing including in her book AZJonnie Yesterday #7

do you admit that Trump is one vile, disgusting POS??? Skittles Yesterday #13

Do you not see what I post, all day and every day? I mean obviously not everything, but generally? AZJonnie Yesterday #15

The premise of this post is wrong, from what I've read. The ID is known, from multiple RockRaven Yesterday #5

See my post #7 above this one. AZJonnie Yesterday #9

and how do you know she wasn't under duress? Skittles Yesterday #14

Because it was in her 2025 memoir that she just wrote, and her estate released posthumously AZJonnie Yesterday #17

speak for yourself Skittles Yesterday #21

We are making the same point. Yes, she is gone, having exonerated him (to her knowledge) on her way out. AZJonnie Yesterday #23

It doesn't matter Boo1 Yesterday #16

I want to address this part of your post Quiet Em Yesterday #20

I get what you mean, but I was asked why *I* am so interested in the case near the top of the thread. AZJonnie Yesterday #24

You are not annoying me and no apology is required. Disaffected Yesterday #22

From what I've read, the "VICTIM" redaction was in the version of the files supplied by the estate, Emrys Yesterday #25

Not suggesting anyone tried to warp the facts, but mistakes can be made on a task like that AZJonnie Yesterday #26

It MIGHT be an inside joke, but to borrow the words of a past US president, "I want to hear him deny it." Emrys 23 hrs ago #28

I've said this like 20 times in various posts over months but not everyone see everything, so again lol AZJonnie 22 hrs ago #29

"the 'complete release of DoJ files' for any case is not a normal occurrence" Emrys 21 hrs ago #30

Setting aside the details of our particular definitions of "great lengths", the point is we agree AZJonnie 21 hrs ago #31

AZJohnny I agree with you that it wasn't Virginia Roberts Giuffre that Chump met at Epstein's house FakeNoose Yesterday #27