General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sorry to annoy everyone yet again, but much about that Epstein email hangs on the accuracy of one word [View all]AZJonnie
(2,250 posts)Suppose there is one and only one place in the documents where "Donna Smith" appears (my theoretical cop). Maybe offhand the redactor don't know who that is, and in the context of the sentence, "Victim" makes sense, and they figure they can't really go wrong saying "Victim".
I hope someone from the Estate comes out and clarifies that " (Victim) " is definitely accurate (or if, for some reason, they actually aren't certain), and at least whether or not it is Guiffre, since the WH has let that out of the bag. I'm skeptical because VG is the *best* possible victim for it to be. She both called Trump a perfect gentleman, and she can't speak for herself anymore. I maintain that a cop/investigator's name makes slightly more sense in the sentence, and I'd be really surprised if it's VG. Victim = VG means the email is a nothingburger. Literally.
I also REALLY want to see the surrounding context. This appears to be the middle of discussion. What are they actually talking about, surrounding this blurb?
This other email? I'd be surprised if that's not some inside joke. In Dec. 2017 IQ47 was POTUS. I don't think he was regularly hanging around Epstein's place at that point. But if he was, then YEAH, he has a LOT to answer about