Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sorry to annoy everyone yet again, but much about that Epstein email hangs on the accuracy of one word [View all]Emrys
(8,748 posts)28. It MIGHT be an inside joke, but to borrow the words of a past US president, "I want to hear him deny it."
And that's going to be true of many loose ends and partially oblique hints and allegations in the files that will be dripped out in coming weeks.
You can tie yourself in knots with all this conjecture and "supposes", but that's about all that can be achieved without all the facts in some (possibly mythical) indisputable form.
Trump's innocence might be easier to defend and sustain if he and his regime weren't going to such great lengths to prevent the files being released.
It looks very fishy, smells worse, and given how many conspiracy theory-minded MAGAites there are and how hard Trump baited them on the stump with promises of a full reveal of all the sordid details, it's a brave strategy, Cotton ...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sorry to annoy everyone yet again, but much about that Epstein email hangs on the accuracy of one word [View all]
AZJonnie
8 hrs ago
OP
I cannot possibly imagine that the DoJ does/did not have everything the Estate has in this regard, long ago
AZJonnie
8 hrs ago
#8
Well, not just Biden's DOJ. Sorry to burst the bubble you'd prefer to exist in, but it is true.
RockRaven
8 hrs ago
#10
Well, that's very convenient since Giuffre REPEATEDLY exonerated Trump of any wrongdoing including in her book
AZJonnie
8 hrs ago
#7
Do you not see what I post, all day and every day? I mean obviously not everything, but generally?
AZJonnie
7 hrs ago
#15
The premise of this post is wrong, from what I've read. The ID is known, from multiple
RockRaven
8 hrs ago
#5
Because it was in her 2025 memoir that she just wrote, and her estate released posthumously
AZJonnie
7 hrs ago
#17
We are making the same point. Yes, she is gone, having exonerated him (to her knowledge) on her way out.
AZJonnie
6 hrs ago
#23
I get what you mean, but I was asked why *I* am so interested in the case near the top of the thread.
AZJonnie
6 hrs ago
#24
From what I've read, the "VICTIM" redaction was in the version of the files supplied by the estate,
Emrys
6 hrs ago
#25
Not suggesting anyone tried to warp the facts, but mistakes can be made on a task like that
AZJonnie
5 hrs ago
#26
It MIGHT be an inside joke, but to borrow the words of a past US president, "I want to hear him deny it."
Emrys
4 hrs ago
#28
I've said this like 20 times in various posts over months but not everyone see everything, so again lol
AZJonnie
3 hrs ago
#29