Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Emrys

(8,748 posts)
28. It MIGHT be an inside joke, but to borrow the words of a past US president, "I want to hear him deny it."
Wed Nov 12, 2025, 11:13 PM
4 hrs ago

And that's going to be true of many loose ends and partially oblique hints and allegations in the files that will be dripped out in coming weeks.

You can tie yourself in knots with all this conjecture and "supposes", but that's about all that can be achieved without all the facts in some (possibly mythical) indisputable form.

Trump's innocence might be easier to defend and sustain if he and his regime weren't going to such great lengths to prevent the files being released.

It looks very fishy, smells worse, and given how many conspiracy theory-minded MAGAites there are and how hard Trump baited them on the stump with promises of a full reveal of all the sordid details, it's a brave strategy, Cotton ...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

you seem very vested in all of this Skittles 8 hrs ago #1
to be honest every day I see dozens here incredibly vested in this. WarGamer 8 hrs ago #3
I have two answers for you AZJonnie 8 hrs ago #4
Is that email in question from the estate? OneGrassRoot 8 hrs ago #6
I cannot possibly imagine that the DoJ does/did not have everything the Estate has in this regard, long ago AZJonnie 8 hrs ago #8
Well, not just Biden's DOJ. Sorry to burst the bubble you'd prefer to exist in, but it is true. RockRaven 8 hrs ago #10
I see you as rather a brilliant person so this reply surprises me. AZJonnie 8 hrs ago #11
I believe my last post failed to communicate to you what I intended. RockRaven 7 hrs ago #18
yeah OK Skittles 8 hrs ago #12
Because Biden wanted to protect others. Sadly. Bluesaph 22 min ago #32
I am one KentuckyWoman 7 hrs ago #19
The White House released the name Abnredleg 8 hrs ago #2
Well, that's very convenient since Giuffre REPEATEDLY exonerated Trump of any wrongdoing including in her book AZJonnie 8 hrs ago #7
do you admit that Trump is one vile, disgusting POS??? Skittles 8 hrs ago #13
Do you not see what I post, all day and every day? I mean obviously not everything, but generally? AZJonnie 7 hrs ago #15
The premise of this post is wrong, from what I've read. The ID is known, from multiple RockRaven 8 hrs ago #5
See my post #7 above this one. AZJonnie 8 hrs ago #9
and how do you know she wasn't under duress? Skittles 8 hrs ago #14
Because it was in her 2025 memoir that she just wrote, and her estate released posthumously AZJonnie 7 hrs ago #17
speak for yourself Skittles 7 hrs ago #21
We are making the same point. Yes, she is gone, having exonerated him (to her knowledge) on her way out. AZJonnie 6 hrs ago #23
It doesn't matter Boo1 7 hrs ago #16
I want to address this part of your post Quiet Em 7 hrs ago #20
I get what you mean, but I was asked why *I* am so interested in the case near the top of the thread. AZJonnie 6 hrs ago #24
You are not annoying me and no apology is required. Disaffected 6 hrs ago #22
From what I've read, the "VICTIM" redaction was in the version of the files supplied by the estate, Emrys 6 hrs ago #25
Not suggesting anyone tried to warp the facts, but mistakes can be made on a task like that AZJonnie 5 hrs ago #26
It MIGHT be an inside joke, but to borrow the words of a past US president, "I want to hear him deny it." Emrys 4 hrs ago #28
I've said this like 20 times in various posts over months but not everyone see everything, so again lol AZJonnie 3 hrs ago #29
"the 'complete release of DoJ files' for any case is not a normal occurrence" Emrys 2 hrs ago #30
Setting aside the details of our particular definitions of "great lengths", the point is we agree AZJonnie 2 hrs ago #31
AZJohnny I agree with you that it wasn't Virginia Roberts Giuffre that Chump met at Epstein's house FakeNoose 5 hrs ago #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sorry to annoy everyone y...»Reply #28