General Discussion

AZJonnie

(2,250 posts)

29. I've said this like 20 times in various posts over months but not everyone see everything, so again lol

Thu Nov 13, 2025, 12:28 AM

8 hrs ago

Trump is GUILTY OF SOMETHING related to Epstein. I don't know that I concur about the idea that they're going to "great lengths", for the simple fact that the "complete release of DoJ files" for any case is not a normal occurrence, it's not like SOP is being broken by Bondi not putting them out there. BUT there has definitely been enough signs that Trump wants them to stay hidden that I think there's shit he does not want coming out. So I for one am NOT defending Trump's "innocence", I'm just not sure exactly what he's guilty OF. BUT ... I know that motherfucker KNEW and said nothing. For absolute positive. The birthday cards PROVES that, even if the real meaning of it is a little more sketchy (again, in my mind).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sorry to annoy everyone yet again, but much about that Epstein email hangs on the accuracy of one word [View all] AZJonnie 13 hrs ago OP

you seem very vested in all of this Skittles 13 hrs ago #1

to be honest every day I see dozens here incredibly vested in this. WarGamer 13 hrs ago #3

I have two answers for you AZJonnie 13 hrs ago #4

Is that email in question from the estate? OneGrassRoot 13 hrs ago #6

I cannot possibly imagine that the DoJ does/did not have everything the Estate has in this regard, long ago AZJonnie 13 hrs ago #8

Well, not just Biden's DOJ. Sorry to burst the bubble you'd prefer to exist in, but it is true. RockRaven 13 hrs ago #10

I see you as rather a brilliant person so this reply surprises me. AZJonnie 13 hrs ago #11

I believe my last post failed to communicate to you what I intended. RockRaven 12 hrs ago #18

Thanks for clarification. This is exactly the sort of cogent argument I always see from RockRaven AZJonnie 4 hrs ago #33

I don't think BeerBarrelPolka 4 hrs ago #34

yeah OK Skittles 13 hrs ago #12

Because Biden wanted to protect others. Sadly. Bluesaph 5 hrs ago #32

I am one KentuckyWoman 12 hrs ago #19

The White House released the name Abnredleg 13 hrs ago #2

Well, that's very convenient since Giuffre REPEATEDLY exonerated Trump of any wrongdoing including in her book AZJonnie 13 hrs ago #7

do you admit that Trump is one vile, disgusting POS??? Skittles 13 hrs ago #13

Do you not see what I post, all day and every day? I mean obviously not everything, but generally? AZJonnie 13 hrs ago #15

The premise of this post is wrong, from what I've read. The ID is known, from multiple RockRaven 13 hrs ago #5

See my post #7 above this one. AZJonnie 13 hrs ago #9

and how do you know she wasn't under duress? Skittles 13 hrs ago #14

Because it was in her 2025 memoir that she just wrote, and her estate released posthumously AZJonnie 12 hrs ago #17

speak for yourself Skittles 12 hrs ago #21

We are making the same point. Yes, she is gone, having exonerated him (to her knowledge) on her way out. AZJonnie 11 hrs ago #23

It doesn't matter Boo1 12 hrs ago #16

I want to address this part of your post Quiet Em 12 hrs ago #20

I get what you mean, but I was asked why *I* am so interested in the case near the top of the thread. AZJonnie 11 hrs ago #24

You are not annoying me and no apology is required. Disaffected 11 hrs ago #22

From what I've read, the "VICTIM" redaction was in the version of the files supplied by the estate, Emrys 11 hrs ago #25

Not suggesting anyone tried to warp the facts, but mistakes can be made on a task like that AZJonnie 10 hrs ago #26

It MIGHT be an inside joke, but to borrow the words of a past US president, "I want to hear him deny it." Emrys 9 hrs ago #28

I've said this like 20 times in various posts over months but not everyone see everything, so again lol AZJonnie 8 hrs ago #29

"the 'complete release of DoJ files' for any case is not a normal occurrence" Emrys 7 hrs ago #30

Setting aside the details of our particular definitions of "great lengths", the point is we agree AZJonnie 7 hrs ago #31

AZJohnny I agree with you that it wasn't Virginia Roberts Giuffre that Chump met at Epstein's house FakeNoose 10 hrs ago #27