Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

stopdiggin

(15,558 posts)

3. ummm. that's not what this ruling said? at all .. ?

Reply to marble falls (Reply #1)

Tue Apr 21, 2026, 08:45 PM

Tuesday

In this case - the judge pointed to (easily understood) - exaggeration .. ?
I.e. - not 'truth' - but also not intended to be understood that way ...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge rules FBI pundit Frank Figliuzzi's contested criticism of Kash Patel was merely "rhetorical hyperbole." [View all] bigtree Tuesday OP

A preview to his lawsuit with the Atlanic. Doesn't he realize that the truth is a postive defence? Some lawyer he was. marble falls Tuesday #1

ummm. that's not what this ruling said? at all .. ? stopdiggin Tuesday #3

The preview is the next case being kicked, too. The reasons are different, with this next case being kicked by ... marble falls Tuesday #4

yep. I missed that one. simple misunderstanding of content and intent stopdiggin Tuesday #5

Lives here in Vegas and the Poodle Room vapor2 Tuesday #2

And Boozy the Clown takes one to the chin! struggle4progress Tuesday #6