Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

angrychair

(12,650 posts)
38. Yet another post that attacks progressives
Fri Jul 10, 2026, 11:12 AM
20 hrs ago

Yet even the slightest of criticism toward moderates/centrists for their positions and the hammer comes down.

As far as I can tell the first requirement for a centrist is that the candidate be white, male, CIS and Christian.
Apparently women, people of color and LGBTQIA+ people need not apply in their world view.

Apparently insider stock trading is fine

Unlimited corporate PAC money is fine.

Endless wars and death in the ME is fine.

Unlimited data centers is fine.

Billionaires and trillionaires are fine

Unlimited police power is fine

Crypto bros and pump and dump coins are fine

Sports betting is fine.

Not having universal healthcare is fine

No family leave is fine

No We The People Act is fine

No privacy protections is fine

No move to protect abortion as healthcare is fine

I say all that because there is nothing in their talking points that wants to change any of that.

I mean, in all seriousness, the ideal candidate, it would seem, for centrists, is John Fetterman.


Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kamala Harris won the election gab13by13 Yesterday #1
Um. NO, she did NOT ! stopdiggin 23 hrs ago #11
Who discredited it? gab13by13 22 hrs ago #15
I am a suspicious type, Scubamatt 22 hrs ago #27
I wish that Bob Casey had called for an audit, gab13by13 21 hrs ago #36
Unfortunately, there is hard proof, but nothing was done. ms.pamela 17 hrs ago #70
I fault Garland for not being aggressive and quick enough wnylib 16 hrs ago #77
I fault him for being complicit n/t blue_jay 16 hrs ago #78
Word! yellow dahlia 13 hrs ago #89
virtually EVERYONE that isn't/wasn't stopdiggin 22 hrs ago #28
Not true ITAL 21 hrs ago #31
Apples and oranges, that's not what I posted. gab13by13 21 hrs ago #37
If every state shifted right ITAL 20 hrs ago #43
There were surges for Trump later in the day on election day gab13by13 20 hrs ago #47
No there weren't ITAL 20 hrs ago #48
Obama won because Anonymous unhacked Ohio. ananda 17 hrs ago #73
Anomalies aren't proof Kaleva 17 hrs ago #74
If voting machines "accidentally"... Chemical Bill 13 hrs ago #85
True. And it has happened over and over again. BComplex 13 hrs ago #86
Hear! Hear! yellow dahlia 13 hrs ago #87
Thank you Lategame 22 hrs ago #25
Did Al Gore lose or did the Supreme Court pick the president? gab13by13 20 hrs ago #39
Al Gore lost his home state of Tennessee! progressoid 19 hrs ago #52
Two things can be true at the same time. nt TBF 19 hrs ago #56
Nader lost his home state of Connecticut DemocracyForever 19 hrs ago #63
Gore won. Has nothing to do with Tennessee MadameButterfly 17 hrs ago #71
No comparison between 2000 and 2024 DemocracyForever 19 hrs ago #61
Hear! Hear! yellow dahlia 13 hrs ago #91
... TBF 19 hrs ago #59
Congratulations on your 13th post questionseverything 16 hrs ago #76
Oh please! T💩p and Eloon fking BRAGGED about stealing the election. OMGWTF 20 hrs ago #45
Kamala did win. Trump said they messed with the "computers". Elon Musk said they BComplex 22 hrs ago #18
Do you usually believe that Trump and Musk statements are truthful? MichMan 20 hrs ago #40
I do. n/t returnee 15 hrs ago #79
She did not. This is conspiracy theory BS and should not be allowed in this forum. beaglelover 20 hrs ago #41
Agre 100% SCantiGOP 20 hrs ago #46
That's not BS, and silencing people is what should not be "allowed" in this forum. BComplex 13 hrs ago #88
No she did not. Please stop posting this election denialism CT as you are Celerity 19 hrs ago #55
So you don't remember all the bomb threats? All the purging of voters? BComplex 19 hrs ago #57
The CT pushers I am referring to are focusing on some grand scheme (often invoking Musk or some other techno villian) Celerity 19 hrs ago #66
It scares me how many people believe our elections are secure. BComplex 13 hrs ago #84
I absolutely stand by calling specific parts of it CT. For example 'This Will Hold' is a crackpot WUM (wind up merchant) Celerity 13 hrs ago #90
Hear! Hear! yellow dahlia 13 hrs ago #93
Maybe Kamala did pursue a recount because her handlers and the strategists told her not to. yellow dahlia 13 hrs ago #92
Republicans have won by cheating for decades. Chemical Bill 14 hrs ago #81
I don't think anyone here is going to sit out RandySF Yesterday #2
Yes. We need a candidate who can win in swing-states and R+5 states... QueerDuck Yesterday #5
So far today I've seen EYESORE 9001 Yesterday #3
It doesn't inspire progressive Democrats does it gab13by13 23 hrs ago #8
Thank you MIButterfly Yesterday #4
Democrats won't be staying home and SocialDemocrat61 Yesterday #6
Gore won, Kerry won gab13by13 23 hrs ago #9
I wish I could say you're wrong PatSeg 21 hrs ago #32
I agree - and it boggles the mind that democrats TBF 19 hrs ago #58
Indeed RetiredParatrooper 23 hrs ago #7
I understand your anger, but we have to find ways to bring in the independent voters FakeNoose 23 hrs ago #10
When 'people decide to stay home' .. stopdiggin 23 hrs ago #14
No ... it happened when some people decided they couldn't vote for a black woman FakeNoose 22 hrs ago #16
Nope angrychair 21 hrs ago #35
Joy has lost her everloving mind. F*ck her nonsensical BS. She can sit her ass at home but me and EVERYONE I know The_REAL_Ecumenist 23 hrs ago #12
At least Donna wrote a sort of mea culpa book about what went on. gab13by13 22 hrs ago #17
This message was self-deleted by its author state of stupid 22 hrs ago #23
I lived in New York Icanthinkformyself 23 hrs ago #13
Please explain the Joy Reid reference johnnyplankton 22 hrs ago #19
Thank you. I have no clue what people are talking about. Joy Reid??? Amaryllis 22 hrs ago #20
Here Pompoy 22 hrs ago #26
here eShirl 22 hrs ago #24
Here it is Cirsium 22 hrs ago #30
Thank you for posting PatSeg 21 hrs ago #33
How so? angrychair 20 hrs ago #42
Bellows and Jackson are progressive Quiet Em 20 hrs ago #50
I think she is just making a point angrychair 20 hrs ago #51
Her point is premature. The leading candidates are progressive. Quiet Em 19 hrs ago #53
The conundrum Cirsium 19 hrs ago #54
I'm not sure what you think I said PatSeg 18 hrs ago #68
If I misunderstood angrychair 18 hrs ago #69
This message was self-deleted by its author Skittles 9 hrs ago #94
Anyone who doesn't think things can get worse can't think. nt eppur_se_muova 22 hrs ago #21
Here, Here! Scubamatt 22 hrs ago #22
It's worse than being a Republican... Joinfortmill 22 hrs ago #29
I am glad the Joy Reid is no longer on MS NOW LetMyPeopleVote 21 hrs ago #34
Yet another post that attacks progressives angrychair 20 hrs ago #38
"Sit out the election to teach Democrats a lesson" MorbidButterflyTat 17 hrs ago #72
Ok angrychair 16 hrs ago #75
You are so wrong on just about everything Pompoy 8 hrs ago #96
What Joy Reid said was wrong, was defeatist, gab13by13 20 hrs ago #44
Terrible Advice dlk 20 hrs ago #49
Another woman Akakoji 19 hrs ago #60
What are you talking about? Quiet Em 19 hrs ago #62
Regrettably now that we live in this new maga/djt/fox reality. Snackshack 19 hrs ago #64
WTF is wrong with her?? She's DEAD to me. She's another Sarandon. Another Nina Turner... QueerDuck 19 hrs ago #65
Dems hurt my feelings, WAAAH WAAAH, I'm not playing anymore WAAAH ImNotGod 18 hrs ago #67
Agreed. I voted for Michael Dukakis, involved in ny case with... NNadir 14 hrs ago #80
Right? Staying home doesn't negate your VOTE. It only means you didn't cast a ballot. Beartracks 14 hrs ago #82
Perhaps last chance. Vote yea or nea. NT You want a democratic republic? warmfeet 14 hrs ago #83
People want change. It's pretty simple. We either make that KPN 8 hrs ago #95
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you sit this one out (...»Reply #38