Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

okaawhatever

(9,563 posts)
91. Thank you, it seems the seniors are starting to come around. I was wondering what the numbers
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 10:01 PM
Oct 2013

looked like recently, so I just reviewed some articles.

From April 2012 Politico article:

Paradox: Dems protect seniors who back GOP
Republicans are adroitly exploiting elder whites’ fears and prejudices. Commentators like The New Yorker’s James Surowiecki, The Washington Post’s Ezra Klein, The Nation’s Christopher Hayes and Harvard sociologists Theda Skocpol and Vanessa Williamson (“The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism”) variously note an alarming trend: Today’s elderly regard themselves as uniquely entitled to government support and resent younger generations getting public benefits

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75543.html#ixzz2ih7XhEMW

From August of 2013 article in The National Memo:

—Seniors are now much less likely to identify with the Republican Party. On Election Day in 2010, the Republican Party enjoyed a net 10 point party identification advantage among seniors (29 percent identified as Democrats, 39 percent as Republicans). As of last month, Democrats now had a net 6 point advantage in party identification among seniors (39 percent to 33 percent).

—More than half (55 percent) of seniors say the Republican Party is too extreme, half (52 percent) say it is out of touch, and half (52 percent) say the GOP is dividing the country. Just 10 percent of seniors believe that the Republican Party does not put special interests ahead of ordinary voters

—In 2010, seniors voted for Republicans by a 21 point margin (38 percent to 59 percent). Among seniors likely to vote in 2014, the Republican candidate leads by just 5 points (41 percent to 46 percent.)

—When Republicans took control of the House of Representatives at the beginning of 2011, 43 percent of seniors gave the Republican Party a favorable rating. Last month, just 28 percent of seniors rated the GOP favorably. This is not an equal-opportunity rejection of parties or government — over the same period, the Democratic Party’s favorable rating among seniors has increased 3 points, from 37 percent favorable to 40 percent favorable

We're making progress. With Obama (who's not up for re-election) stating he's willing to look at chained CPI, he gives the chance for every Democrat seeking re-election to announce their staunch support of the programs.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K7R pscot Oct 2013 #1
I'm With You 777 WillyT Oct 2013 #3
Absolutely not. Plain and simple. Autumn Oct 2013 #2
:loveya: WillyT Oct 2013 #4
love ya too WillyT Autumn Oct 2013 #10
How do you define "cutting?" treestar Oct 2013 #5
Oh No... You Tell ME... What "Cuts" Do Not Impact Those ENTITLED TO THE BENEFITS THEY'VE EARNED ??? WillyT Oct 2013 #8
You didn't answer: what's a "cut"? Recursion Oct 2013 #21
Under a chained CPI they will go down, relative to the inflation faced by the elderly Dragonfli Oct 2013 #24
By definition, no Recursion Oct 2013 #26
misinformation Dragonfli Oct 2013 #27
Yes, your post was. Glad you recognize that (nt) Recursion Oct 2013 #28
Chained CPI does not figure inflation correctly. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #37
That's a good synthesis of how it's been described on DU, but not very accurate Recursion Oct 2013 #58
The bottom line is that this should not be a part of any Deficit talks sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #86
He is sitting in Mumbai, India RandiFan1290 Oct 2013 #44
What is disgusting is attacking Americans because they live in another country treestar Oct 2013 #52
This again? Recursion Oct 2013 #61
Total misinformation. Enthusiast Oct 2013 #50
They always leave that out - that even if it were adopted, it would not treestar Oct 2013 #51
The Chained CPI is intended to cut SS. Not 'by definition' or any other sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #70
The average Social Secuirty benefit is maybe 200 dollars above the minimum wage level. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #36
Why do you ignore the fact that under O's floated proposal the poorest 1/3 keep the old CPI? Recursion Oct 2013 #60
Gee, upthread you were claiming that CCPI is the more true measure of inflation, a good thing Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #74
Nope Recursion Oct 2013 #75
Because the people between 1/3 and 1/2 still fall gradually below the poverty line. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #87
The poverty rate among US seniors is 15% Recursion Oct 2013 #89
I guess I am wayyyyy below avg. Bohunk68 Oct 2013 #73
Yes. Approximately 1/2 of the receipients of Social Security are under the average level. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #88
It's a simple question treestar Oct 2013 #49
Anything that takes a single penny away from those who OWN that fund. sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #69
no, No and NO cantbeserious Oct 2013 #6
No! truebluegreen Oct 2013 #7
Exactly TexasBushwhacker Oct 2013 #15
cost cutting measures can be made without cutting benefits krawhitham Oct 2013 #9
And You'd Better Be Damned Careful, Honest, And Explicit When You Try To Explain That Theory... WillyT Oct 2013 #13
How? Medicare has lower administrative costs than does private insurance. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #38
Propose yes. Proposing it can be nothing more than a political chess move. Actually voting for okaawhatever Oct 2013 #11
Like the chess move that pays banks $85 billion a month because it's good for the little people? jtuck004 Oct 2013 #23
You are watching to much Richard Wolff BelgianMadCow Oct 2013 #25
I had heard the name, but never read up on him. But behold, a web site. jtuck004 Oct 2013 #35
He made an analysis of the recovery that isn't a recovery unless you disregard the majority BelgianMadCow Oct 2013 #48
+1 cui bono Oct 2013 #32
Plus 1,000,000! Enthusiast Oct 2013 #53
Ommm.....none of the things you mentioned, except the expiration of the Recovery Act, have anything okaawhatever Oct 2013 #90
And they say manufacturing is dead, yet some can manufacture excuses all day long. jtuck004 Oct 2013 #93
It's the Democrats who keep raising the subject. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #34
Dempocrats may be betraying their ideals by suggesting cutting social security, but they aren't for okaawhatever Oct 2013 #92
Proposing it puts it on the table, LWolf Oct 2013 #65
"You want X? Ok, what will you give me for X?" That's the game. JoePhilly Oct 2013 #85
Thank you, it seems the seniors are starting to come around. I was wondering what the numbers okaawhatever Oct 2013 #91
YUP ... and your last sentence really nails another great point. JoePhilly Oct 2013 #95
Time to bring out the old "anti-war" crew. Hell, no we won't go ... without healthcare for our libdem4life Oct 2013 #12
snatch defeat from the jaws of victory dembotoz Oct 2013 #14
Chuckle ReRe Oct 2013 #30
That's "Democratic". Enough with the Rovian re-naming. riqster Oct 2013 #43
never.... mike_c Oct 2013 #16
Me Too... WillyT Oct 2013 #17
Already cut SS benefits when they upped age to get full benefits. kiranon Oct 2013 #18
exactly. So many on here swear their precious democratic leaders have never hurt SS. liberal_at_heart Oct 2013 #22
+10000 woo me with science Oct 2013 #29
It wasn't that the increases Bohunk68 Oct 2013 #71
We need to end the trade agreements that permit US jobs to be moved overseas without JDPriestly Oct 2013 #40
We need a pro-American trade policy. Enthusiast Oct 2013 #59
"Where are the jobs?" Enthusiast Oct 2013 #56
That's sacred territory BlueJazz Oct 2013 #19
What's a "cut"? Recursion Oct 2013 #20
A reduction in buying power. Quit your dancing, your answer is yes but it is preferred TheKentuckian Oct 2013 #62
"Too generous" is a weird way to put it. Recursion Oct 2013 #63
I'm pushing for reductions to the TSP portion of FERS, we can't afford that extra gravy Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #76
I don't see what is weird about it. That has to be the argument, most folks are just over broke, at TheKentuckian Oct 2013 #83
They are too meager, which is why it would have to include something big Recursion Oct 2013 #84
medicare needs to EVOLVE. the SS FICA cap needs to be ELIMINATED. BOOM that is it. pansypoo53219 Oct 2013 #31
What evolution do you propose for Medicare? JDPriestly Oct 2013 #41
No way, Jose ReRe Oct 2013 #33
Depends. pnwmom Oct 2013 #39
Depends on circumstances - how bad things are, what people might get in return, whether Hoyt Oct 2013 #42
I had to choose "No"... because there wasn't a "NO WAY IN HELL!" option.... Ghost in the Machine Oct 2013 #45
^ agree100% with Ghost! peacebird Oct 2013 #46
Hell no. nt DLevine Oct 2013 #47
Chained CPI is CUTTING Social Security eridani Oct 2013 #54
not just hell no but, gopiscrap Oct 2013 #55
Let Senator Durbin know how you feel--sign the CREDO petition eridani Oct 2013 #57
As it says on the red graphic .... Scuba Oct 2013 #64
Well they may say they won't Puzzledtraveller Oct 2013 #66
Yes Savannahmann Oct 2013 #67
This is not election season. If Skinner wants to ban folks for being actual Democrats he Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #77
The question was would I support them? Savannahmann Oct 2013 #80
need to see the short and long-term explanations and total package alc Oct 2013 #68
hell no... Slashed Enough Already eShirl Oct 2013 #72
I'm calling bullshit on myself. dawg Oct 2013 #78
Is there a video of a Democrat making such a proposal? JoePhilly Oct 2013 #79
No meanit Oct 2013 #81
I generally wouldn't but given the option of either voting for them or a Republican/Independent with Xyzse Oct 2013 #82
That "logic" means you can be herded as long as their is that scarier alternative TheKentuckian Oct 2013 #94
Well, this is how I voted Obama. Xyzse Oct 2013 #96
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Brass Tacks 2.0... Would ...»Reply #91