Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Summer That Will Change the Internet Forever [View all]
http://www.vox.com/2014/5/8/5694826/this-summer-will-change-the-internet-and-media-forever"It's impossible to overstate how massive Comcast will become if it's allowed to buy Time Warner Cable. The combined company will have 31 million TV customers and 32 million broadband subscribers, dwarfing every other company in the United States. It will be the only major service provider in 19 of 20 major American cities. And it will also own NBC Universal, which means it will control a massive number of cable channels, film studios, production companies, MSNBC, and NBC itself...."
"At this point it's fair to call the furor over the FCC's Open Internet rulemaking process a full-on crisis. The short version is that the FCC's old net neutrality rules preventing ISPs like Comcast from throttling services like Netflix were thrown out by a federal court in February, and new FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler responded with a new set of rules that basically everyone hates... except ISPs like Comcast. (This is where a cynical person points out that Wheeler used to be a prominent cable industry lobbyist
Wheeler's new rules would allow ISPs to create "fast lanes" on their services that a company like Apple could pay to use, so (for example) iTunes movies would stream better than Google Play movies. That would fundamentally change the entire way American businesses and consumers have experienced so far, and as more and more media moves to the internet (see the Aereo decision below) it could change the fundamental costs of publishing..."
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

If the basic speed is fine, what is the problem with an optional fast lane, paid for by the
Fred Sanders
May 2014
#1
Because the basic speed (bandwidth) will need to be increased over time to handle extra demand.
Armstead
May 2014
#2
You dont seem to have a clue. If the cable companies can decide who gets fast and who gets slow
rhett o rick
May 2014
#3
It's a barrier to innovation - a new company has to pay extra to establish itself
muriel_volestrangler
May 2014
#11
My web hosting company says all the hysteria in that post is unfounded. Which makes me question
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#4
Well, we shall see. I'm told all that is happening is that the telcos are going to open the dark
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#9
And who is your ISP? Perhps they are sincere --or they're lying through their teeth
Armstead
May 2014
#10
Providing information that I was given is "snide" and "condescending"? Your...
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#17
Hysteria and knee jerk hate of anything to do with corporations by some is getting boring.
Fred Sanders
May 2014
#12
Well, Adam Smith felt that corporations were inevitably a bad way to do business:
mbperrin
May 2014
#15
Nobody in this thread has said it's a good thing nor has anyone shaken pom-poms over it. But
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#23
My web host is not as large as Host Gator or GoDaddy, but they do host hundreds of
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#28
Oh, you misunderstand and you have it backwards. The reason we're talking about it is because
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#31
Not sure if I've replied to your threads...said most of my piece on this topic in response to
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#29
So, if I am using a website to sell widgets, how does this effect me? Let's go a bit further...
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#18
I do remember the huge surplus of fibre optic that only a few years ago was said to be so
Fred Sanders
May 2014
#34