General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If Rachel Dolezal wants to embrace black culture... [View all]XemaSab
(60,212 posts)One of the things I'm finding so fascinating about this story is the discussions of ethnic authenticity, and which parts of one's ethnicity it's okay to go all in with and which parts get left out.
I'm 1/4 Scots-Irish, and as a white person, I can be as Celtic as I want. I have a Scots-Irish last name, and I can "pass" as full-blooded with ease. Never mind the fact that it's only part of my heritage and that my dark McFro (three out of five on the nappiness scale!) is actually from the Swedish side, it's still something I can go all out with. I can be 110% Celtic and nobody's going to blink.
You've got an equal claim to that heritage, but according to the way race is constructed and defined in America today, your African blood somehow makes you not "authentically" Irish.....?
The idea that part of your heritage is somehow cancelled out by another part is so ridiculous. (I'm not saying you're ridiculous, I'm saying the "rules" are.)
I don't have to pick between my various Euromutt ethnicities. I can be Swedish, Scots-Irish, and German ALL AT THE SAME TIME.
White privilege, yo.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):