Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,905 posts)

1. I don't know for sure but I would guess the latter rather than former

Reply to SoutherDem (Original post)

Mon May 14, 2012, 05:53 PM

May 2012

I believe that there was some minor detail about the story that WAPO didn't quite right or one of the witnesses hadn't witnessed the incident or something like that and, unlike Fox News, issued a correction/update but I don't believe that it undermined and/or unraveled the story in any significant way.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sorry to revisit this but it keeps coming back like a bad penny [View all] SoutherDem May 2012 OP

I don't know for sure but I would guess the latter rather than former Proud Liberal Dem May 2012 #1

It has not unraveled in the slightest, AFAIK. It was solidly sourced and coalition_unwilling May 2012 #2

No, Sir, The Man is Simply Lying: That is What He is Paid To Do The Magistrate May 2012 #3

There has NOT been any unraveling of the story. The RW spinners are trying to claim that blm May 2012 #4

I think this is a wishful pronouncement gratuitous May 2012 #5

A woman who was not there has gone on record as not having seen it jberryhill May 2012 #6

wishful thinking librechik May 2012 #7

Then why didn't Rmoney keep denying it Politicalboi May 2012 #8