General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Neil deGrasse Tyson destroys argument for intelligent design [View all]King_Klonopin
(1,355 posts)So, if I am intelligent, I am supposed to agree with his premise that asteroids and tornadoes
are absolute proof that God doesn't exist ??!!
Those things are evidence that there is chaos and entropy in the universe (terms he knows too well).
They fail to disprove God's existence any more than a flat tire or a head cold disprove God's existence.
Professor D. (astrophysics) paraphrases the tired old hack of an argument -- if God existed, there
would be perfect order and a complete absence of suffering in the natural universe.
If you ever studied chemistry, biochemistry and physiology and took a look at the macro and micro
precision of how this all works in concert, how can you conclude it is merely by random happenstance ?
Pardon me, if I fail to swoon. Thomas Aquinas made more convincing arguments than these.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):