Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

usonian

(21,255 posts)
7. I'll take a look.
Thu Sep 18, 2025, 04:41 PM
Sep 18

It has been my feeling that any community, not just DU, but even my friends (Buddhist group) should have very local discussion groups, with calendaring and scheduling and structured discussions, of only HIGHLY TRUSTED members, with the ability to connect (somehow) to other similar groups.

As it is, we have some online discussions, but nothing is saved for future quotes (meaning lost) or to gather info into a knowledge base. That would be especially useful for new members, so they can catch up with accumulated wisdom in addition to getting current advice and hearing stories from leaders and old-timers that can be really valuable.

I am unfamiliar with all the recent forum software, and what I knew has changed names, just to confuse everyone.

In addition, I have some paradigms for information management not yet unleashed on the world. (top hush for now).

I have followed Moodle for many years, and it hasn't changed its name! YMMV, but I used to install it on laptops (my own) and company servers to hold my project documentation. Given that unless people do a deep dive, like using github, that usually amounts to going over someone else's "doc" files. Hardy collaborative.

So, I'll check into things "that just work" and as an aside, continue to urge people to use Signal Messenger. It messages, it does video conferencing ... and is designed from the start to be secure (though lazy use could weaken it in action)

No forum software that I know of is ultra-secure, but being able to move a small instance around (with those connections as needed) saves the "all your eggs in one basket" kind of vulnerability we see.

I do see more decentralization as big organizations cower to the emperor. (as in programs moving off TV, which BTW, I don't use except for one football game a week)

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

STOP! elleng Sep 18 #1
Stop what? sir pball Sep 18 #2
The more a "possibility" is noisily bruted about, the more possible it gets. Do you want that? Bernardo de La Paz Sep 18 #4
Any backup plan they have will be moot intheflow Sep 18 #8
A gangster web is not resistance bc it will attract more surveillance, not less & attract harsher crackdowns Bernardo de La Paz Sep 18 #10
I haven't written anything off as moot. intheflow Sep 18 #13
Post #8 you wrote "Any backup plan they have will be moot" Bernardo de La Paz Sep 18 #14
Never heard of it. Must be enormously popular, known to all DU members except me, so everyone can find it. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 18 #3
It's the ultimate Dark Web. sir pball Sep 18 #5
If you can join it but you think Patel or Blondi can't surveil it, you are indulging in fantasies Bernardo de La Paz Sep 18 #6
C'mon. intheflow Sep 18 #9
I am well aware of "OG" for years. It is a disgusting homage to criminals from early days of rap and such. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 18 #11
My point about surveilance has not made an impression on you Bernardo de La Paz Sep 18 #12
They can surveil it, but that's all they can do. sir pball Sep 18 #15
Users leave clues in their content. And comprehensive surveillance of internet onramps would be very revealing. . . .nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 18 #16
Clearly you aren't familiar with the network. sir pball Sep 18 #17
If users can easily talk to each other, then some are talking to bots or agents, particularly on the dark web. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 18 #18
Users can talk fairly easily, but they retain anonymity. sir pball Sep 18 #19
If content is put up to the cloud it can be analyzed. If it is destined to your favorite dark web Bernardo de La Paz Sep 18 #20
It's not in the cloud. sir pball Sep 18 #21
NSA knows more about DSA than we ever will. Plus they have no shortage of compute power. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 18 #22
As a programmer, you should know how Freenet works. sir pball Sep 18 #23
I'll take a look. usonian Sep 18 #7
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Activist Headquarters»Should DU start a Hyphane...»Reply #7