Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(6,655 posts)
55. Nope. Congress has no say at this point as far as I can find.
Mon Jul 21, 2025, 04:56 PM
Jul 21

From Google's AI (As far as I can tell, this is all accurate. I'm posting this because it's a lot more succinct than posting a half dozen different articles.)

No, Congress does not need to approve a stadium deal in Washington, D.C. The District of Columbia has the authority to approve or reject a stadium deal for the Washington Commanders. While Congress initially granted D.C. control over the RFK Stadium site, it is now up to the D.C. Council to approve any specific redevelopment plan, including a new stadium.
Here's a breakdown:
Congress's Role:
Congress previously passed legislation giving D.C. control over the RFK Stadium site. This legislation, signed into law by President Biden in January, allowed the city to develop the site, including for a potential new stadium.
D.C. Council's Role:
The D.C. Council is the local legislative body responsible for making decisions about the city's land use and development. They are now considering the Commanders' proposal for a new stadium and related development.
No Congressional Approval Needed:
While Congress initially granted D.C. control, it does not need to approve any specific stadium plan. The D.C. Council has the final say on whether to move forward with the project, according to NPR.
Possible Congressional Influence:
Although not required, Congress could potentially exert some influence over the project through oversight or by attaching riders to future legislation. However, the primary decision-making power rests with the D.C. Council.
Recent Developments:
Recent news reports indicate that a Republican Congressman, James Comer, is urging the D.C. Council to approve the deal before their August recess. This shows a level of Congressional interest, but it does not mean they have the power to force approval.

The one thing Trump could do to scuttle a deal is to try to get DC Council to disapprove it. But you can see from above that Republican James Comer actually wants DC council to APPROVE the deal before August recess.

As for Trump tying things up in court for years, I doubt that. I would think any lawsuit brought by Trump would be dismissed relatively quickly. Trump has already admitted he would try to block a stadium deal solely because of his own frivolous and ridiculous personal wishes. He has no legal or other basis to block a deal.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Let him have this fake fight. EPSTEIN!!!! johnnyfins Jul 21 #1
Are you implying the Felon doesn't want to talk about Buddyzbuddy Jul 21 #2
Perhaps they should threaten to rename the team the Washington Epsteins? 70sEraVet Jul 21 #11
"Epstein" should be the answer to everything PatSeg Jul 21 #33
He gave away his game there. C_U_L8R Jul 21 #3
Hey dimwit. Your job isn't to fuck up everything but you do. twodogsbarking Jul 21 #4
Revenge for NFL not giving him a franchise? Captain Zero Jul 21 #5
They never let him play football on the playground. They called him names. twodogsbarking Jul 21 #6
Team should Rebl2 Jul 21 #42
Such an overachiever PatSeg Jul 21 #34
Just another trump extortion scheme, pure and simple. Paladin Jul 21 #7
And 60 Minutes CBS Paramount deal MadameButterfly Jul 21 #20
Shut the fuck up liberalgunwilltravel Jul 21 #8
Yes, Donny bring back the racist names. That is good use of a President's time. Botany Jul 21 #9
SOOOOOOOOOOO sick and tired of his fucking threats! calimary Jul 21 #10
Just another one of Stinky's diversions from the Epstein fiasco. Ray Bruns Jul 21 #12
There is nothing that he doesn't demand to be his way. sinkingfeeling Jul 21 #13
He is trying anything and everything to reenergize his base. everyonematters Jul 21 #14
I've been trying very hard to not dehumanize his "base" LS0999 Jul 21 #54
They should ignore him. No press scrums, no statements. If he sends a letter, send a polite letter back "No thanks". .nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 21 #15
Simple: The owners should move the team Chasstev365 Jul 21 #16
I'd love to see it happen. Paladin Jul 21 #21
They could more to NJ the home of two NY footballs teams. Historic NY Jul 21 #23
Trump has no authority to stop the stadium deal. Wiz Imp Jul 21 #17
In normal times, you are correct Chasstev365 Jul 21 #25
I think Congress still retains the right to veto any decisions by the D.C. Council. LudwigPastorius Jul 21 #50
Nope. Congress has no say at this point as far as I can find. Wiz Imp Jul 21 #55
Snyder should build in a nearby city instead and give krasnov the middle finger. lark Jul 21 #18
Snyder sold the team Henry203 Jul 21 #28
Oops! lark Jul 21 #29
Snyder is no longer the owner. . . DinahMoeHum Jul 21 #30
Slight correction Wiz Imp Jul 21 #39
Thanks. DinahMoeHum Jul 21 #45
I had to check if this was The Onion Martin Eden Jul 21 #19
Poe's Law. tblue37 Jul 21 #52
This and demanding money isn't this extortion Blue Full Moon Jul 21 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author doc03 Jul 21 #24
Hey Mr. Business Man it's a trademark issue. You can't trademark a derogatory word underpants Jul 21 #26
I guess he will also hold the proposed new Browns stadium hostage to force Cleveland to doc03 Jul 21 #27
How would he have any authority over a stadium in Cleveland? Wiz Imp Jul 21 #37
Why would that stop him? doc03 Jul 21 #41
Huh? How's he going to stop anything? He can't. He can threaten all he likes. Threats can be ignored. Wiz Imp Jul 21 #44
What do today's GOPers think of a president who tries to force private businesses Ocelot II Jul 21 #31
In other words BumRushDaShow Jul 21 #32
Washington Epsteins mac56 Jul 21 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author Lasher Jul 21 #36
They could change their name specifically to honor Trump Miguelito Loveless Jul 21 #38
I believe in separation of sports and state. 4th Jul 21 #40
It strikes me odd that a narcissist like Orange Julius Caesar, as Commander-in-Chief, would object generalbetrayus Jul 21 #43
The Washington Pedos Sogo Jul 21 #46
Old man yells at clouds azureblue Jul 21 #47
remember 6 mos ago when repubs hated 'govt overreach' KG Jul 21 #48
Screw 'em. LudwigPastorius Jul 21 #49
None of his business. kskiska Jul 21 #51
The Wahington Swollenshins. twodogsbarking Jul 21 #53
Umm... keroro gunsou Jul 21 #56
He must have nearly every WH staffer combing thru everything to find things he can use to make demands Attilatheblond Jul 21 #57
"I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,'" OldBaldy1701E Jul 22 #58
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump threatens to hold u...»Reply #55