Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,319 posts)
11. Not yet - and perhaps not at all
Wed Jul 23, 2025, 08:29 PM
Jul 23

There were actually two cases within a few years of each other - one that said the president could fire people he appointed... and the other that said he couldn't. The difference turned on whether the agency Congress created was fully part of the executive branch or instead "quasi legislative" and "quasi judicial," in which case he couldn't (other than for cause).

So they could easily rule that both cases remain precedential and rule based on whether each of the agencies involved was clearly part of the executive branch. I suppose they could also rule that in some of these cases the president was firing people for cause... though I don't think the record reflects that.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court hands Trump...»Reply #11